G2

Verified User in Manufacturing

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

4/1/2026

"Solid threat visibility that actually helps with prioritization"

5/5

What do you like best about Threat Landscape Platform?

As a Cyber Risk Officer, my main problem with threat intel has always been the sheer volume of alerts. What I actually like about Threat Landscape is that the feed is highly curated. It’s low volume but high quality. I’m not drowning in generic alerts, which means my team actually pays attention to the data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Threat Landscape Platform?

There is definitely a learning curve. Because the platform pulls together a lot of different elements like source material, MITRE mappings, and exposure data, it’s not immediately obvious where to start if you’ve never used it. Right now, onboarding a junior analyst requires a senior team member to sit next to them and show them the ropes. A proper, in-app guided walkthrough or a more intuitive "getting started" workflow would save us a lot of training time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is Threat Landscape Platform solving and how is that benefiting you?

It solves the problem of manual correlation. Before, we were manually cross-referencing OSINT feeds and darknet chatter with our own environment to figure out if we were at risk. Now, that happens in one place.

The biggest benefit is time and alignment. I can log in before a leadership meeting and know exactly what active threats apply to us. It stops us from chasing ghosts and ensures the SOC and the CISO are operating off the exact same data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.