G2

Kenny T.

Civil Engineer

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

10/12/2026

"Fast, Objective Technical Evaluations with Clear, Shareable Reports"

4.5/5

What do you like best about RubricAI?

What I like best about RubricAI is how it brings structure and objectivity to our technical evaluations. In our construction company, we deal with a lot of assessments daily, contractor method statements, safety checklists, site quality reports, intern assignments, and training submissions from junior engineers. Earlier, reviewing them against our internal rubrics was very time-consuming and subjective.

RubricAI has made this process fast and consistent. I just upload our custom quality rubric and the documents, and it evaluates each criterion with a clear score and justification. The bulk processing and evidence-based feedback save me hours every week, especially during QA/QC reviews. The interface is simple and the reports are easy to share with the management and site teams.

For a civil engineer, it’s like having an extra QA reviewer who never misses a detail. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RubricAI?

There's not much to dislike, RubricAI has been very useful for our quality and training evaluations. The only issue is that sometimes for highly technical civil documents with drawings and site photos, it focuses more on text and misses some visual details. Also, the initial setup to create a detailed rubric for our construction standards took some time. The customization for industry-specific terms could be better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is RubricAI solving and how is that benefiting you?

In construction, we evaluate a lot of submissions against strict standards - safety reports, method statements, concrete quality checklists, daily progress reports from junior engineers, and contractor compliance documents. Before RubricAI, this was all manual, took hours, and depended on who was reviewing. Scores were inconsistent and feedback was often delayed.

RubricAI is solving this by automatically evaluating documents against our custom rubrics with clear scoring and evidence-based feedback. We can now do bulk evaluations, maintain consistency across different projects, and archive all reports for audit purposes.

The benefit for me is huge time savings, what took a full day now takes less than an hour. Our site quality reviews are more objective, junior engineers get faster and clearer feedback, and we have a proper record of every evaluation for our QA/QC documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.