Joe H.
JH
Project Engineer (HV Electronics)
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Simple, Fast Modelling of Complex Systems"
4/5
What do you like best about PLECS?

Simple drag and drop blocks, all components are idealised, and basic loss parameters can be inserted. Else, you can build your circuit/system models by manual adding discrete components to simulate your parasitic elements, ensuring that you are defining every part of your simulation in as much detail as you require. This makes PLECS far quicker to get results than a traditional SPICE simulator if you are not concerned with device-physical behaviours.

The software also features the ability to quickly and intuitive build sub-systems within your simulations by masking a prebuilt circuit create a functional block - for example, you may model a multilevel converter, but have it masked under a sub-system block with only the gate signals and power inputs/output available in the main simulation. This keeps your working area nice and tidy and also means you can easily reuse circuit elements across simulations.

The software also possess the ability to do simple thermal analysis by use of thermal resistance/capacitance analogies. By no means as effective as FEA for thermal analysis, but a good starting point for early systems development.

There are also mechanical domain simulation elements included, but I have not tired those in my line of work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about PLECS?

The nature of PLECS means that switches are always assumed to be idealised, therefore control and gate signals aren't simulated in the same domain as the rest of the circuit. Therefore It can be difficult to quantify the effects of less than ideal gate edges in fast switching applications with high dv/dt and di/dt. But this is largely besides the point of the software, as it is not a SPICE type simulator. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

See what 26 reviewers think of PLECS

4.5 out of 5 · Verified reviews from real users

Read all reviews