Ronaldo P.
RP
Studio Production & Digital Asset Coordinator
Photography
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Comprehensive GDPR Compliance, Needs Better Integration"
4.5/5
What do you like best about photokit?

As our studio’s digital asset coordinator, Photokit’s EU-based cloud storage and layered permission system are its biggest strengths. I can lock sensitive client portrait folders and full model release archives away from junior retouchers to avoid accidental data leaks, which keeps us compliant with GDPR portrait data rules. When uploading raw commercial shots, the tool auto-tags each batch and links matching digital consent forms automatically, storing all release paperwork to hit Germany’s mandatory multi-year retention requirements. The pre-built usage log exports are formatted specifically for local copyright auditors—this alone cuts several hours of spreadsheet restructuring out of every quarterly audit prep. I also rely heavily on its batch raw editing function; we can process large commercial shooting sets entirely inside the platform without bouncing files between separate editing software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about photokit?

There’s no native bidirectional sync with our enterprise DAM system, so moving raw footage, edited assets, and licensing logs back and forth means endless manual CSV and ZIP exports/imports. There’s no bulk editing function for expired model consent tags, so I have to open and adjust every single file individually when release terms lapse. The reporting dashboards don’t offer enough customization to match Stuttgart’s official copyright audit formats, which forces me to rework every exported log in Excel afterward. The mobile app also doesn’t display complete consent archives, slowing down all on-location asset and compliance checks I run at our secondary shooting spaces. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

See what 50 reviewers think of photokit

4.3 out of 5 · Verified reviews from real users

Read all reviews