G2

Antonios S.

Advisor

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

10/4/2026

Business partner of the seller or seller's competitor, not included in G2 scores.

"Free, All-in-One Systematic Review Tool That Saves Serious Screening Time"

5/5

What do you like best about Meta-analysis360?

It's free. The whole review can be done by hand without paying or needing a university licence. This matters most to students and independent researchers. Everything is in one place. Protocol, search, screening, extraction and forest plot all live in one project, with no exporting to Excel or a separate statistics package. Human in the loop. Each screening suggestion has a written reason, and each extracted number shows the sentence and page it came from, so they can verify it quickly instead of trusting it. It saves time on screening. In the BMJ re-run, a reviewer only had to look at 88 of 3,201 records. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Meta-analysis360?

Would like to have even lower prices but they are covering the costs of the LLMs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is Meta-analysis360 solving and how is that benefiting you?

Cost: the whole pipeline is free to run by hand, on two projects with unlimited collaborators, and only the AI help is paid. Much of the established review software is licensed by institutions or sold by subscription, which leaves out independent researchers, students and teams in lower-resource settings. One place: the data extracted is the data that gets pooled, in the same project, so nothing is retyped into a separate statistics package. A check you can do yourself: screening suggestions carry their reasons, extracted values carry their quotations, and uncertain records go to the reviewer rather than being excluded. Evidence in the open: the screening has been re-run against published reviews and scored against their own lists of included studies. An included study was never lost. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.