G2

Solomon A.

Digital Marketing Manager

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

11/2/2026

"Organized Translation Workflow with Time-Saving GitHub & Figma Integrations"

4/5

What do you like best about LingoHub?

I use LingoHub at Yebehir Marketing to manage translations for client websites and campaign content, mainly between English and Amharic, and have for about four months. Since I also handle front-end work, it fits well into how we build multilingual Next.js sites.

What I value most is how it keeps all translations organized in one place. Before, we sent JSON files and spreadsheets back and forth with translators, which caused version mix-ups and missing strings. Now translators work directly in LingoHub’s editor, and I always know which strings are translated, in review, or missing.

The GitHub integration saves the most time. New text from our code syncs into LingoHub automatically, and finished translations go back as pull requests, so I no longer copy strings between files by hand. The Figma integration also lets us translate design text before development starts.

Translation memory and the term base keep brand names and key phrases consistent across projects, which matters for our clients’ brand voice. The AI and machine translation suggestions give translators a solid first draft, which speeds up work, especially for repetitive content.

Performance is reliable, and large files sync quickly. Onboarding was straightforward, and support answered our setup questions promptly. Pricing is fair for the time saved and the reduction in translation errors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about LingoHub?

The biggest limitation for us is machine translation quality for Amharic. Suggestions for English to Amharic are often too literal or grammatically awkward, so translators rewrite most of them. The AI works much better for widely used languages, which limits its value for our main use case.

The interface also has a learning curve. Project settings, workflows, and integration options took some time to understand, and translators who aren’t technical needed guidance at first. Some features, like branching and review workflows, felt complex until we had used them for a while.

The GitHub integration works well once set up, but initial configuration of file paths and formats took trial and error, and occasional sync conflicts needed manual fixes.

Pricing can also feel high for a small agency as the number of projects and words grows.

Overall, these are manageable issues. Better support for less common languages like Amharic and simpler onboarding would make LingoHub much stronger for teams like ours. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is LingoHub solving and how is that benefiting you?

Before LingoHub, managing multilingual client websites was messy. We sent JSON files and spreadsheets to translators by email, tracked progress manually, and often discovered missing or outdated translations only after a site went live. Copying translated text back into the code was slow and caused errors.

LingoHub centralizes the whole translation process. New text from our code syncs automatically, translators work in one shared editor, and finished translations flow back into our projects through GitHub. Translation memory and the term base keep brand names and key messaging consistent across every client site.

The biggest benefit is speed and accuracy. We launch English and Amharic versions of sites and campaigns faster, with fewer missing strings and less manual work for developers. Clients get consistent messaging across languages, which strengthens their brand with local and international audiences.

Overall, LingoHub has turned translation from a bottleneck into a smooth part of our development workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.