
The MCP server, without question. It plugs into Claude Code - the environment I already build in - so I can ask which SOC 2 controls my codebase satisfies and what still needs work, and the answer comes back in the same window as the code. Keldyn never takes a copy of it. The first time I ran it, it went through the whole codebase, told me what was missing, and pushed the lot into Jira as tickets. It did a serious amount of my work for me.<br><br>What makes that credible is the scoping underneath it. Keldyn's lead, Tom built the system description around the commitments we actually make to our merchants rather than a template, and the risk register came off our real architecture - 13 scenarios, each sized for a two-person company. Nothing got implemented that the business didn't need, which matters a lot when there's no GRC lead to absorb the overhead.<br><br>The result is that compliance shows up as work rather than as a report. I was able to wire up Keldyn's MCP along with Jira so that findings are filed under a dedicated epic and get prioritized alongside product. When I refactored the platform for protocol changes, I reran the assessment and confirmed in minutes that nothing had regressed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We haven't sat for the audit yet, so this is a review of the readiness process, not the outcome. It also assumes you're comfortable in a dev environment - if your compliance owner isn't technical, someone on the engineering side will need to drive the MCP piece. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.