G2

Jatin M.

CTO

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

10/6/2026

"Dynamic Conversation AI Agentic Interviews"

5/5

What do you like best about InterviewCandy?

I used InterviewCandy for hiring at Druid Learning. The interview feels like talking to a person. It’s a dynamic conversation: the interviewer picks up what you just said and asks a follow-up on the spot, instead of marching through a fixed question list. Those follow-ups are what make the first round feel like a live phone screen rather than a one-way recording. Afterward I still use the transcript and scorecard. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about InterviewCandy?

I’d want tighter ATS sync (invite + write-back of outcome without copy-paste) and a clearer default on when integrity monitoring is on, so recruiters don’t have to hunt for that setting per job. I am sure this is being built by the team currently Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is InterviewCandy solving and how is that benefiting you?

The problem was first-round volume: too many applicants, too few hours for phone screens, and one-way video that didn’t let us probe an answer. We were either skipping people or burning recruiter time on scheduling.

InterviewCandy takes that first live conversation, follow-ups included so candidates complete it from a link on their schedule. We get a transcript and scorecard instead of a voicemail pile. Benefit: we shortlist faster without pretending the AI hired anyone. People still decide who moves on; we just stop playing phone tag for every screen. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.