HackerEarth Assessments Reviews & Product Details

HackerEarth Assessments offers a highly user-friendly and intuitive interface for both candidates and recruiters. One of its greatest strengths is how easy it is to use—setting up assessments, inviting candidates, and reviewing results are all simple and efficient tasks.

Implementation is also very smooth, as the platform integrates seamlessly with existing HR tools and systems, which helps minimize manual work. Its extensive feature set—including customizable coding questions, multiple-choice questions, project-based evaluations, and proctoring options—makes it adaptable to a variety of hiring requirements.

Customer support is responsive and helpful, particularly when it comes to setting up new tests or resolving issues.

In summary, this is a dependable platform that we regularly use for both technical and non-technical assessments. Its integration with ATS systems ensures it fits naturally into our recruitment process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would appreciate having more detailed explanations or sample test runs provided after the assessment, as this would allow candidates to learn from their mistakes. Receiving such feedback would be very helpful for improving skills before the next attempt. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- The platform provides an extensive library of pre-built questions and coding challenges, covering many almost 38+ programming languages and numerous domains. It feels easier to implement code solutions.

- It features advanced proctoring (webcam monitoring, screen recording) for secure and fair assessments. Therefore, Good for making right decision.

- Analytics and reports offer detailed insights into candidate performance.

- The interface is user-friendly and highly customizable, making it easy to create, launch, and manage skill-based assessments efficiently.

-Companies use it frequently.

-It is easily integrated with there numerous platform.

- I have used the platform many times, customer support is good for onboarding users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- User interface can sometimes feel cluttered or overwhelming, especially for first-time users or when working under time pressure.

- Customization options for question formats and categories are somewhat limited,

- Pricicng bit high for small businesses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about HackerEarth Assessments is how easy it is to implement and get started with. The platform is intuitive, so our team was able to create and launch assessments quickly without a long learning curve. It integrates smoothly with our existing ATS and internal systems, which saves a lot of manual effort.

The feature set is quite comprehensive — from customizable question libraries to strong proctoring and analytics. We use it frequently for both campus and experienced-hire assessments, and it’s been reliable across all scales.

I also appreciate their customer support; the team is responsive and proactive whenever we face integration or setup queries. Overall, it strikes a great balance between ease of use, flexibility, and performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While HackerEarth Assessments works well overall, there are a few areas that could be improved. The reporting dashboard could offer more customization options and better visualization for large-scale results. Occasionally, the platform takes a bit longer to load when multiple assessments are active simultaneously.

Integration with certain ATS platforms can also require additional configuration effort, and some advanced features have a slight learning curve for new users.

These are relatively minor issues compared to the overall functionality, but improving them would make the experience even smoother. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

HackerEarth Assessments offers a user-friendly platform that streamlines the hiring process.

The variety of question types—ranging from coding challenges to analytical tasks—helps evaluate candidates across different skill sets.

I also appreciate the detailed reports after each assessment, which provide insights into a candidate's performance. Customer Support is also one of the key. We can easily integrate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While the platform is great overall, one downside is the limited customization options for question formats. It would be helpful if we had more flexibility in tailoring assessments to our specific needs.

Additionally, at times, the UI can feel a little overwhelming with too many options to navigate, especially when you’re in a time crunch. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best part is how it helps us screen large pools of candidates quickly. The automated evaluation and reports save a lot of manual effort and make hiring more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some coding questions have very strict time limits, which can stress candidates. A little flexibility or better hints would improve the experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

“The wide variety of pre-built coding challenges and question banks makes it easy to quickly create role-specific assessments.”

“The platform provides detailed analytics and candidate reports, which help in making informed hiring decisions.”

“It supports multiple programming languages and simulates real coding environments well, which improves the candidate experience.” Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user interface could be more intuitive, especially for non-technical recruiters setting up assessments.”

“Reporting and analytics are helpful but sometimes lack deeper insights or custom export options.”

“The question bank is good, but some problems feel outdated or not aligned with real-world scenarios.”

“Customer support response time can be slow during urgent hiring cycles.”

“Pricing can be on the higher side compared to similar platforms.” Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate how HackerEarth Assessments combine a clean interface with a wide range of question types—from coding challenges to conceptual QA questions. The platform is intuitive, loads quickly, and provides a focused environment for solving problems. I also like how it simulates real-world scenarios, helping candidates showcase practical skills, not just theoretical knowledge. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I found challenging was the lack of real-time feedback or hints during the test. It would be helpful to know if a submission is on the right track, especially for coding questions. Also, some questions could benefit from clearer wording to avoid confusion. Improving these areas would make the experience smoother and more confidence-building. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about HackerEarth Assessments is how seamlessly the platform combines ease of use with powerful functionality. The user interface is intuitive, which makes it easy to focus on solving problems rather than figuring out navigation. It offers a wide range of features—from coding challenges and MCQs to project-based tasks—that help assess different skill levels effectively.

From a user perspective, setup and implementation are hassle-free—everything runs smoothly in-browser with no additional configurations needed. Even occasional users can quickly get up to speed thanks to the clean design. While I haven’t needed to reach out to customer support personally, the help documentation is quite comprehensive. The platform’s ability to integrate different question formats and proctoring tools creates a robust and fair assessment environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While HackerEarth offers a great assessment experience overall, there are a few areas that could be improved. At times, the problem statements can be slightly unclear or lack real-world examples, which can lead to confusion during assessments. More illustrative examples or visual aids would enhance the ease of use, especially for first-time users.

Additionally, feedback on failed test cases is minimal, making it harder to debug or understand what went wrong—adding more detailed hints (post-submission) would improve the learning experience.

Though the platform is feature-rich, some features—like proctoring or UI hints—could be better explained or more visible. I also feel that live or faster customer support during assessments could really enhance the experience for users facing technical glitches. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There isn't a single best feature, as different users find different aspects most helpful. Some appreciate the AI-powered proctoring and real-time candidate monitoring, which ensures the integrity of the assessment process. Others value the wide range of programming languages and frameworks supported, allowing them to test candidates on a variety of skills. A frequent highlight is the extensive library of pre-built questions across various domains, which saves recruiters a significant amount of time. The detailed reports and analytics are also often praised for providing deep insights into a candidate's performance, helping hiring managers make data-driven decisions. Ultimately, the combination of these features makes it a robust and efficient tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I've found the platform's user interface can sometimes be a bit clunky, making it a little confusing to navigate, especially when you're first getting started. Also, the pricing can be a hurdle; it doesn't always seem to scale well for smaller companies or startups with limited budgets. While the core features are strong, I sometimes wish there were more customizable options for creating highly specific assessments that fit very unique job roles. Finally, like any complex online tool, you might run into the occasional technical issue, which can be frustrating, even if it gets fixed quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

HackerEarth Assessment is easy to use with a smooth interface, diverse question types, and reliable proctoring that ensures fair evaluations. The coding environment is practical and post-assessment reports make hiring decisions quicker. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI can feel a bit crowded, debugging test cases is not always straightforward, and result generation could be faster. Adding more customization and data science questions would make the platform even stronger. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.