Enago is quite accurate comparing to other plagiarism tools I’ve tried. Since it’s associated with Turnitin, the features feel familiar, and I find the large database scholarly articles reassuring it helps ensure thorough checks. I also like that it provides detailed similarity reports, which make it easy to see where matches are coming from Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I find frustrating is that, like Turnitin, it doesn’t do a great job detecting AI-written content and can produce false positives sometimes. It also feels a bit expensive, especially if you need to scan a lot of documents regularly. Additionally, it doesn’t have grammar-checking built-in, so I have to use other tools alongside it. These limits can be a bit inconvenient depending on your needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.