it makes testing easy. I don’t have to spend hours writing test cases or keep fixing them every time something changes in the app. I can just tell it what I want to test and let Drizz take care of the repetitive stuff. It saves my time and makes testing feel way less of a hassle.

It’s basically one of those tools that makes my work a little easier without making things complicated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the main thing I’d say is that it’s not always as predictable as traditional automation. For simple flows, it can save a lot of time, but when you get into complex scenarios, edge cases, or very specific validations, I’d still want more control over exactly how the test is executed.

I’d also like better debugging when something fails. As a tester, I want to quickly understand why a test failed, not just that it failed. Having more detailed logs, steps, and control over retries or test behavior would make it easier to trust it for larger test suites.

So overall, I like the idea a lot, but I’d say more control and better debugging would make Drizz much stronger for serious day-to-day testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.