What I like about Claude is that I trust the AII most for development work. It holds context well across long conversations. It gives me clean, readable code and explains why it made a choice instead of just dumping output. It also pushes back when my approach is flawed, which has saved me from bad architecture decisions more than once. The writing quality is natural and not robotic, so I use it for client proposals as well as code.

If I talk about the performance, It's fast with good reasoning

and it's very easy to use with natural native language. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Usage limits can run out in the middle of a deep working session, which breaks my flow. It can occasionally be overly cautious or verbose, and for very recent technologies, it sometimes needs a nudge to check current docs.

It consumes more tokens as the conversation gets longer to maintain the context. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.