![Divyam S.](/assets/transparent-ad5be28fbcd25b7b08d2cebe1d957125437fb5407d75ee717965ad22c8808791.gif "Divyam S.") DS Divyam S. Senior Advisor Insurance Enterprise (\> 1000 emp.) 5/26/2026 "A Reliable Tool for Faster, Smarter Proposal Creation" 4/5 What do you like best about AutogenAI? What I like most about AutogenAI is the control it gives me over the information it uses. I can pull answers from a specific library, webpage, or my own uploaded files, which makes the output much more reliable and relevant. This is especially useful when working on proposals where accuracy is critical. The “Ask AI” feature is something I use often—it consistently gives useful responses based on my prompts and helps me move forward quickly when I’m stuck. From a workflow perspective, it has made a noticeable difference. Creating the first draft of proposals is usually time-consuming, but AutogenAI speeds this up significantly. It also helps me analyze RFx documents more efficiently, saving me a lot of manual effort. In terms of UI/UX, the platform is quite intuitive. It doesn’t take long to get used to, and navigating between features like Ask AI, document analysis, and content generation feels smooth. The layout is clean and practical, which makes day-to-day use easy. Performance-wise, I’ve found it to be reliable. The responses are generally quick and relevant, and I haven’t faced any major issues while using it regularly. On integrations, while I mainly use it with internal libraries and uploaded documents, that capability itself is very powerful. Being able to centralize and reference trusted content sources adds a lot of value. Pricing and ROI-wise, the time it saves on drafting and analysis definitely justifies the investment. It reduces the effort needed for repetitive tasks and allows me to focus more on refining content rather than starting from scratch. Support and onboarding have been excellent. The onboarding process was smooth, and the training sessions were genuinely helpful. Sean and the Autogen team were very supportive and made sure everything was clearly explained and easy to set up. Overall, the AI capabilities are strong and practical—not just generic outputs but context-aware responses based on trusted inputs. It’s a very valuable tool in my day-to-day work, especially for proposal drafting and RFx evaluation. I’d confidently rate it a 10/10 and would definitely recommend it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com. What do you dislike about AutogenAI? One area where AutogenAI could improve is expanding beyond text-based outputs. For example, having the ability to create simple graphics, visuals, or charts directly within the platform would be very useful. Right now, I need to rely on other tools for this, which breaks the workflow and adds extra steps. Collaboration is another area with room for improvement. While the current functionality works, it can feel a bit limited when multiple users are contributing to the same document. More seamless collaboration—such as easier sharing, clearer version control, or real-time editing—would make teamwork much more efficient, especially for proposal development. From a usability standpoint, the UI is generally clean, but managing multiple documents or switching between tasks can sometimes feel a bit less intuitive than it could be. Streamlining navigation and improving how content is organized would save time during daily use. In terms of integrations, the ability to use internal libraries is strong, but deeper integrations with commonly used tools (like document management or collaboration platforms) would help reduce manual effort and improve overall efficiency. Performance is mostly reliable, though there is occasional lag when working with larger or more complex documents. Improving responsiveness in these scenarios would make a noticeable difference. Overall, these aren’t major issues, but addressing them would significantly enhance the user experience and make the platform even more powerful for day-to-day work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com. What problems is AutogenAI solving and how is that benefiting you? Before using AutogenAI, we struggled with starting proposals from scratch and manually going through lengthy RFx documents to identify key requirements. This process was time-consuming and often required multiple iterations to get a solid first draft in place. With AutogenAI, I can now quickly generate first drafts of proposals, which saves a significant amount of time upfront. It also helps me analyze RFx documents more efficiently by pulling out the most important details, so I don’t have to go through everything manually. Building a clear storyboard has become much easier, which improves the overall structure and quality of our responses. Another major benefit is the ability to evaluate responses using Gamma reviews and rely on content sourced from specific libraries or web pages. This gives us better control over accuracy and consistency, which is critical in proposal work. Overall, what used to take hours of effort can now be done much faster, allowing me to focus more on refining and improving the content rather than starting from scratch. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com. Show More Response from Drenny Bajri of AutogenAI [Editedit](https://www.g2.com/survey_responses/autogenai-review-12871483/official_response/edit) Thank you so much for such a detailed and generous review. We're really pleased to hear that Ask AI is a consistent part of your daily workflow and that the control over source inputs, whether from specific libraries, webpages or uploaded files, is delivering reliable and context-aware outputs rather than generic responses. That level of precision is something we've invested heavily in, and it's great to hear it translating directly into proposal accuracy and RFx efficiency. It's also great to hear that the UI/UX feels intuitive, that performance has been reliable, and that the time savings on drafting and analysis are clearly justifying the investment. Knowing that Gamma reviews and storyboard building are adding structure and quality to your responses is exactly the outcome we aim for. We'll also make sure the kind words about Sean and the onboarding team get passed on directly. Really glad that experience set you up well. On the development side, your points around visual and chart creation, real-time collaboration, version control, deeper integrations with document management platforms, smoother multi-document navigation and performance on larger files are all well noted. These are themes we're actively working through as we continue to build out the platform, and detailed feedback like yours helps us prioritise the right things. Thank you again for taking the time to share such a thorough review. We look forward to continuing to support your work. - The AutogenAI Team Rating Updated (5/29/2026) Current UserValidated ReviewerIncentivizedSource: G2 invite on behalf of seller See what 160 reviewers think of AutogenAI 4.3 out of 5 · Verified reviews from real users [ Read all reviews ](https://www.g2.com/products/autogenai/reviews)