Escape is built with a wide range of protocols in mind and shows a strong understanding of how they work. In particular, I really liked how it handles GraphQL operations. I’ve gotten better results than with traditional DASTs. The UI/UX offers a lot of transparency into what the tool is doing and how it reports issues. Filtering is excellent, and it’s easy to adapt it to whatever prioritization matrix you use. Scans are also quick. Escape comes with the baseline integrations you need from day one. It covers the same integrations you’d expect from other DAST platforms, and the team is quick to work with you on new ones when there’s enough interest and it improves the overall experience. Support has been consistently strong: they typically respond within half a day and do a great job helping resolve issues. They’re also willing to jump on calls to debug and fix things together. Escape's AI Copilot is great on its own, but if you want to extend it further, you can use Escape MCP with other AI tools to build your own triage pipelines with custom context and knowledge. I was an early adopter of Escape, and their pricing has been fair since day one.

Escape has an excellent modern approach to DAST testing making it easy to manage complex single threaded scans. One of the nicest/underated features is the screen capturing in scan logs allowing teams to quickly validate if authentication has occured and to assess product coverage.

Easy to setup Easy to integrate to your CI/CD Public and private internal APIs supported Nice advices and examples for your developers to address issues Capacity to create workflows