# Tuskr Reviews
**Vendor:** Tuskr  
**Category:** [Ferramentas de Gerenciamento de Testes](https://www.g2.com/pt/categories/test-management)  
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5.0  
**Total Reviews:** 561
## About Tuskr
Tuskr é um software moderno de gerenciamento de testes baseado em nuvem que oferece uma gama de recursos para aprimorar seus processos de teste. Escreva casos de teste expressivos com texto rico, tabelas e capturas de tela. Conduza execuções de teste flexíveis usando todos ou um subconjunto de seus casos de teste. Integre-se perfeitamente com seus sistemas de chat e rastreamento de problemas. Desfrute de recursos de nível empresarial, como lixeira, trilha de auditoria, autenticação de dois fatores e login único para segurança aprimorada. Tuskr gera relatórios de teste detalhados e métricas perspicazes, proporcionando melhor visibilidade e permitindo decisões baseadas em dados. Oferecemos um plano gratuito generoso e opções de preços flexíveis adequadas para pequenas equipes a grandes empresas. Comece com nosso teste gratuito de 30 dias, incluindo dados de amostra, para uma avaliação rápida e fácil. Nossa equipe dedicada de suporte ao cliente garante uma experiência refrescante, comprometida em resolver seus problemas. Experimente a eficiência e conveniência do Tuskr para um gerenciamento de testes simplificado.



## Tuskr Pros & Cons
**What users like:**

- Os usuários acham o Tuskr **extremamente fácil de usar** , tornando as tarefas de QA simplificadas e acessíveis para novos membros da equipe. (177 reviews)
- Os usuários valorizam a **criação simplificada de casos de teste** no Tuskr, aumentando a produtividade e a colaboração entre as equipes. (120 reviews)
- Os usuários apreciam a **organização** que o Tuskr proporciona, simplificando os dados de teste e aumentando a produtividade sem esforço. (113 reviews)
- Os usuários apreciam a **interface de usuário limpa e intuitiva** do Tuskr, melhorando significativamente sua experiência geral de teste. (109 reviews)
- Os usuários acham o Tuskr **intuitivo e fácil de usar** , aumentando a produtividade na gestão de testes e geração de conteúdo sem esforço. (81 reviews)
- Economia de tempo (72 reviews)
- Colaboração em Equipe (69 reviews)
- Configuração Fácil (57 reviews)
- Rastreamento (57 reviews)
- Funcionalidade (52 reviews)

**What users dislike:**

- Os usuários acham as **opções limitadas de personalização** no Tuskr restritivas, especialmente para necessidades de teste complexas e em evolução. (57 reviews)
- Os usuários acham que a **pobreza nos relatórios** no Tuskr limita as opções de análise avançada e personalização para necessidades de teste mais complexas. (53 reviews)
- Os usuários encontram **problemas de integração** com o Tuskr, particularmente pela falta de conexões perfeitas com ferramentas avançadas de gerenciamento de projetos. (46 reviews)
- Os usuários experimentam **desempenho lento** ao lidar com listas de projetos grandes ou suítes de teste, o que pode prejudicar a produtividade geral. (28 reviews)
- Os usuários enfrentam uma **curva de aprendizado** desafiadora com o Tuskr, exigindo paciência para navegar por funções e configurações avançadas. (25 reviews)
- Os usuários acham que os **recursos limitados** e as integrações do Tuskr são insuficientes para as necessidades corporativas maiores e flexibilidade. (23 reviews)
- Problemas de Automação (21 reviews)
- Os usuários enfrentam **dificuldades de teste** com o Tuskr, particularmente com importação de testes, organização e problemas de desempenho em projetos grandes. (20 reviews)
- Os usuários observam **informações insuficientes** sobre os recursos, especialmente a falta de relatórios avançados e acesso offline, afetando a usabilidade. (18 reviews)
- Dificuldade do Usuário (15 reviews)

## Tuskr Reviews
  ### 1. Streamlined QA Management with Improved Reporting Needed

**Rating:** 4.5/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Nishith J. | Devops intern, Pequena Empresa (50 ou menos emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** May 12, 2026

**O que você mais gosta em Tuskr?**

I like how Tuskr keeps the testing workflow organized without making the process feel too complicated. The structure for test cases, test runs, and execution status is easy to follow, making it clear what has been tested, what failed, and what still needs attention. I also appreciate how easy it is to review testing progress at a glance, quickly understanding which areas are stable and which need fixes. The initial setup was also fairly straightforward, especially for basic test case creation and test run management. The interface is easy enough to understand, so it doesn't take much time to get started with a small project.

**O que você não gosta em Tuskr?**

One area that could be improved is reporting and customization. Tuskr is useful for organizing test cases and test runs, but when working with larger test suites, I sometimes feel the report could be more flexible. It would be helpful to have more options to filter, group, and present results based on project needs. For reporting, I think Tuskr could improve by offering more flexible dashboards and export options. For customization, it would help if teams could create more custom fields, statuses, templates, and workflows based on their own QA process.

**Que problemas Tuskr está resolvendo e como isso está beneficiando você?**

I use Tuskr to manage test cases, keep QA runs organized, and track execution status, avoiding scattered data. It helps maintain clear visibility of pass/fail results and progress, making testing structured and connected.

  ### 2. Versatile, User-Friendly Test Automation Essential

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** javed k. | sales, Pequena Empresa (50 ou menos emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** May 05, 2026

**O que você mais gosta em Tuskr?**

What I like most about Tuskr is how simple and well-structured it feels compared to using spreadsheets. It makes it easy to organize test cases in a clear, consistent way, and the interface is straightforward enough for the whole team to use with little to no training. I also appreciate the integrations with tools like Jira, which help collaboration run more smoothly between QA and development.

**O que você não gosta em Tuskr?**

The reporting features could be more flexible, particularly when it comes to building custom dashboards. Also, when I’m working with larger test suites, performance can slow down a bit. It’s not a major issue overall, but it’s an area that could definitely be improved.

**Que problemas Tuskr está resolvendo e como isso está beneficiando você?**

Before Tuskr, we managed our test cases in spreadsheets, which made tracking progress and collaborating with the team difficult. Now everything is centralized in one place, improving visibility and reducing confusion during release cycles. Overall, it saves time and keeps our QA process much more organized.

  ### 3. Tuskr Makes Test Case Reusability and Regression Testing Effortless

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Md Z. | Product Manager, Tecnologia da Informação e Serviços, Empresa (> 1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** April 15, 2026

**O que você mais gosta em Tuskr?**

The Tuskr feature I’ve found most useful is its approach to test case reusability, which also makes regression testing much simpler. With regular use, I’ve seen that once a test case is created, it can be reused easily across different test runs and even across projects. This removes the need to recreate the same test cases over and over, which saves a significant amount of time.

This is especially valuable during regression testing, where having structured, pre-existing test cases means they can be executed quickly and consistently. On top of that, Tuskr’s interface makes it straightforward to organize, update, and maintain test cases, which helps keep the overall testing process efficient over the long term.

**O que você não gosta em Tuskr?**

Although the reusability feature is excellent, it’s important to set up a clear structure from the beginning so it can be managed effectively. If test cases aren’t categorized properly early on, reusing them later can become challenging and time-consuming. Also, new users may need a bit of time to understand some of the more advanced features.

**Que problemas Tuskr está resolvendo e como isso está beneficiando você?**

Tuskr has largely solved the biggest challenge I faced: repetitive test case creation and inefficient regression testing. Before, preparing test cases for each new test cycle was a time-consuming effort. Now, by reusing existing test cases, I can complete the same tasks much faster. As a result, the testing process moves along more quickly, stays more consistent from cycle to cycle, and makes it easier to maintain overall product quality.

  ### 4. Tuskr Keeps Testing Organized with a Clear, Easy Workflow

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Vikash S. | Data Scientist, Empresa (> 1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** May 09, 2026

**O que você mais gosta em Tuskr?**

What I personally liked about Tuskr is how it keeps the testing process organized without making the platform feel overly technical. With a well-structured workflow, managing test cases, tracking execution status, and reviewing overall progress becomes much easier and more straightforward. For small and mid-sized IT teams, it feels especially practical, since new team members can get up to speed quickly without needing to spend too much time on training.

**O que você não gosta em Tuskr?**

One area where I think there’s room for improvement is the overall flexibility around integrations and customization. While the core features run smoothly, some of the more advanced automation or reporting needs you’d expect in larger QA environments can feel a bit limited. Also, when working with very large sets of test cases at once, the process can start to feel slightly repetitive, since certain bulk management actions could be streamlined and optimized further.

**Que problemas Tuskr está resolvendo e como isso está beneficiando você?**

In software development environments, maintaining clear communication between testers and developers can be challenging, especially during fast release cycles. Tuskr helps address this by centralizing testing activities and making them easier to track and monitor. It reduces reliance on scattered spreadsheets and constant manual follow-ups, and it helps teams spot failed scenarios more quickly. From an IT perspective, it improves visibility into the QA process and supports better release management through more controlled, consistent testing workflows.

  ### 5. Tuskr Brings Consistency and Visibility to the Entire QA Lifecycle

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Gul M. | Information Technology Project Coordinator, Médio Porte (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** May 07, 2026

**O que você mais gosta em Tuskr?**

From a software engineering and QA management perspective, Tuskr helps address one of the most common operational challenges in testing environments: maintaining consistency and visibility across the entire QA lifecycle. It enables teams to standardize testing procedures, cut down on manual tracking, and strengthen collaboration between QA analysts, developers, and project managers. The platform is especially effective for organizing regression testing, tracking execution progress, and reducing communication gaps during release validation. For growing IT teams that want to improve testing efficiency without adding unnecessary operational complexity, Tuskr is a reliable and practical solution.

**O que você não gosta em Tuskr?**

Although the platform works well for standard QA workflows, a few advanced, enterprise-level capabilities could still be strengthened. In particular, some reporting areas can feel a bit less dynamic when deeper analytics or highly customized performance insights are needed. On larger projects with extensive regression cycles, managing dependencies across multiple test suites can also occasionally feel less streamlined than expected, especially when compared with more mature enterprise testing platforms.

**Que problemas Tuskr está resolvendo e como isso está beneficiando você?**

Tuskr provides a well balanced test management environment that feels both lightweight and professionally structured. What stood out to me most was how clear test planning and execution tracking are, especially when working through agile sprint workflows. The platform also makes it easier to maintain traceability between requirements, test cases, and execution results, which I’ve found very helpful for QA coordination in fast-paced development teams. Overall, the UI feels clean and straight forward, cutting down on unnecessary complexity while still offering enough depth to support professional testing operations.

  ### 6. Streamlined QA Made Effortless with Tuskr

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Zoya S. | Digital Marketing Manager, Médio Porte (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** January 07, 2026

**O que você mais gosta em Tuskr?**

Tuskr transforms daily QA tasks into a more streamlined experience, avoiding the usual bureaucratic feel. Its clean interface, quick navigation, and intuitive test case hierarchies make it easy for new team members to get up to speed right away. Features like bulk cloning and reusable steps are real time-savers when creating regression suites for similar workflows. The execution screen conveniently brings together comments, attachments, and status updates in a single view, helping testers remain focused on the testing itself.

**O que você não gosta em Tuskr?**

As a project evolves and its architecture shifts, updating the initial test structure such as sections and fields can sometimes feel inflexible. It often takes some manual effort to tidy things up and restore a clean organization. Additionally, uploading large videos or heavy screen recordings tends to slow down execution sessions, which means the team may need to compress files or use external links for particularly large assets.

**Que problemas Tuskr está resolvendo e como isso está beneficiando você?**

Tuskr has consolidated our previously scattered spreadsheets and ad-hoc status updates into a unified source of truth for both coverage and results. Now, release discussions begin with shared, reliable data rather than conflicting versions. This centralization has brought greater predictability to regression planning, made onboarding new team members more straightforward, and significantly simplified post-release bug analysis, since every test run is now both traceable and easy to review.

  ### 7. Clean, Distraction-Free Interface with Thoughtful Test Management Layout

**Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Jatin P. | Ui Ux designer , Pequena Empresa (50 ou menos emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** May 04, 2026

**O que você mais gosta em Tuskr?**

What I like best about Tuskr is how clean and distraction free the interface feels, especially compared to most test management tools that tends to be cluttered and overwhelming.
As a UI/UX person, I immediately noticed how thoughtful the layout is structured, everything from test cases to runs and reports is logically grouped, so you are not hunting around for basic actions.

**O que você não gosta em Tuskr?**

What I dislike about Tuskr is mostly around the edges where you start pushing beyond basic workflows.
While the simplicity is a strength, it can also feel limiting. As you test cases grow more complex, the customization options aren't as flexible as I'd like.
The UI, although clean, sometimes hides functionality a little too well.

**Que problemas Tuskr está resolvendo e como isso está beneficiando você?**

Tuskr solves the problem of scattered and unstructured QA workflows. Instead of managing test cases across spreadsheets, docs, and tools, it brings everything into one centralized system.
For me, the biggest benefit is clarity. I can quickly see what's tested, what's failing, what's pending  without chasing updates.

  ### 8. Tuskr Brings Clarity and Consistency to QA Workflows

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Prem V. | Marketing Specialist, Médio Porte (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** April 30, 2026

**O que você mais gosta em Tuskr?**

Tuskr provides a well structured, user friendly environment for managing QA activities. Its intuitive design keeps the learning curve low, allowing teams to quickly standardize how they manage and execute test cases. From a professional standpoint, it brings more clarity to day-to-day workflows, strengthens traceability across test scenarios, and supports consistent documentation practices across projects, which is valuable for maintaining quality standards.

**O que você não gosta em Tuskr?**

Despite being easy to use, Tuskr has some limitations when it comes to scalability and more advanced needs. The reporting module, in particular, lacks the depth and flexibility required for data driven decision making at higher management levels. In addition, its ecosystem doesn’t integrate as broadly with enterprise tools like Jira or with advanced CI/CD pipelines, which can limit its effectiveness in more complex, DevOps driven environments.

**Que problemas Tuskr está resolvendo e como isso está beneficiando você?**

Tuskr plays a significant role in addressing operational QA challenges by centralizing test assets, improving visibility into execution cycles, and enabling better coordination among team members. It helps streamline manual testing workflows and reduces dependency on fragmented tools. However, for strategic problem solving such as end to end automation tracking, predictive analytics, or large scale quality engineering practices—organizations may need to supplement it with more robust solutions.

  ### 9. Ótimas Integrações, Necessita Paciência para Configuração

**Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Spencer C. | Founder, Gestão de Organizações Sem Fins Lucrativos, Pequena Empresa (50 ou menos emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** April 24, 2026

**O que você mais gosta em Tuskr?**

Aprecio as excelentes opções de preços do Tuskr. Você pode experimentá-lo gratuitamente com até cinco usuários, ou optar por um plano de equipe, que custa cerca de $90 por usuário por ano, tornando-o bastante razoável a menos de $10 por mês. Também é ótimo que o Tuskr se integre bem com praticamente qualquer outro programa de escrita de código, como Jira, GitHub, Slack, Harvest, e aparentemente mais de 400 outras integrações.

**O que você não gosta em Tuskr?**

Tuskr é um software altamente técnico, então você precisa estar familiarizado com codificação e outros programas como o GitHub para usá-lo efetivamente. Para iniciantes, levará algum tempo para se acostumar. Configurar o Tuskr requer algum tempo, e integrá-lo completamente levará meses.

**Que problemas Tuskr está resolvendo e como isso está beneficiando você?**

Eu uso o Tuskr para rastreamento de projetos e redação de casos de teste. Ele mantém tudo organizado e se integra bem com outras ferramentas como Jira, GitHub e Slack. No entanto, o Tuskr é técnico e requer conhecimento de programação, o que pode ser desafiador para iniciantes.

  ### 10. Gestão de Tarefas Sem Esforço com Integrações Sem Costura

**Rating:** 5.0/5.0 stars

**Reviewed by:** Aditya P. | System Engineer, Médio Porte (51-1000 emp.)

**Reviewed Date:** November 18, 2025

**O que você mais gosta em Tuskr?**

Tuskr é muito prático para o trabalho diário de QA, incluindo planejamento de testes, design de casos de teste, acompanhamento de execução e gerenciamento de ciclos de regressão. Ele ajuda as equipes a manter os cenários de teste claramente documentados, reutilizar casos de teste em diferentes versões e monitorar o status de execução de forma eficiente. Isso é especialmente útil em ambientes Ágeis, onde lançamentos frequentes exigem testes consistentes e bem organizados. Também melhora a visibilidade da cobertura de testes, facilitando a confirmação de que a funcionalidade crítica está devidamente validada antes da implantação.

**O que você não gosta em Tuskr?**

A ferramenta está faltando algumas das capacidades avançadas necessárias para escalar em ambientes empresariais maiores, como logs de auditoria detalhados, análises de teste mais avançadas e integração mais profunda com frameworks de automação. Como resultado, sua eficácia pode ser limitada em projetos complexos que envolvem múltiplas equipes e grandes volumes de dados de teste.

**Que problemas Tuskr está resolvendo e como isso está beneficiando você?**

Na prática, as equipes podem fechar essas lacunas emparelhando o Tuskr com outras ferramentas. Por exemplo, integrá-lo com o Jira para rastreamento de defeitos e confiar em frameworks de automação separados para execução pode ajudar a construir um ecossistema mais completo. Também pode ser útil exportar dados para análise externa, enquanto mantém processos de QA estruturados internamente, para obter o máximo da ferramenta.


## Tuskr Discussions
  - [Para que serve o Tuskr?](https://www.g2.com/pt/discussions/what-is-tuskr-used-for) - 3 comments
  - [O Tuskr pode ser integrado com outras ferramentas?](https://www.g2.com/pt/discussions/tuskr-can-be-integrated-with-other-tools) - 1 comment, 1 upvote

- [View Tuskr pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/tuskr/reviews/tuskr-review-6548423?section=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-05-18+15%3A36%3A37+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=3678b9ab-c7af-48da-a5ce-7c4458fb5e34&secure%5Btoken%5D=a82e0e69ac8bbbf0ebd121b81a47b121e5dcdc9ba8eb976461293a3db9f2df6e&format=llm_user)
## Tuskr Integrations
  - [ClickUp](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/clickup/reviews)
  - [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/github/reviews)
  - [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/gitlab/reviews)
  - [Jenkins](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/jenkins/reviews)
  - [Jira](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/jira/reviews)
  - [Microsoft Excel](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/microsoft-excel/reviews)
  - [Microsoft Power BI](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/microsoft-microsoft-power-bi/reviews)
  - [Microsoft Teams](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/microsoft-teams/reviews)
  - [Slack](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/slack/reviews)
  - [Slack Connector for Jira](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/slack-connector-for-jira/reviews)

## Tuskr Features
**Funcionalidade**
- Repositório de teste
- Integração
- Diversidade de testes

**Agente AI - Teste de Software**
- Execução Autônoma de Tarefas
- Interação em Linguagem Natural
- Assistência Proativa

**Gestão**
- Relatórios
- Controle de versão
- Escala

## Top Tuskr Alternatives
  - [TestRail](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/testrail/reviews) - 4.4/5.0 (592 reviews)
  - [Qase](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/qase/reviews) - 4.7/5.0 (302 reviews)
  - [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/pt/products/browserstack/reviews) - 4.4/5.0 (3,247 reviews)

