What I like most about Wrike is the visibility it gives me across projects, tasks, and my team’s workload—all in one place. The dashboards, reports, and task updates help me stay organized, follow progress more quickly, and keep team coordination running smoothly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike most is that some views and automations feel less intuitive than I’d expect, especially when I’m managing multiple spaces or trying to centralize control. As a result, both the initial setup and ongoing administration can take more time than necessary. It would be helpful to have simpler cross-space reporting, along with more flexible automation triggers to make managing everything across spaces smoother. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I can't really think of anything positive about it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Wrike is not very user-friendly, and its project structure doesn’t effectively support practical project management. The calendar views are difficult to navigate, customization tools can stop working unexpectedly, tagging projects is cumbersome, and there are no pre-built sections or tags for tracking budgets.

After struggling with Wrike for the past year, our team decided to switch to Asana, which is significantly easier to use and more effective for project management overall. When we informed Wrike of our decision, we were told that we were outside the 30-day cancellation window and had been automatically renewed for another year. Rather than showing any flexibility, they enforced a full 12-month commitment.

This approach feels like poor business practice. If a customer wants to leave because the product no longer meets their needs, they should be allowed to do so—rather than being locked into a contract against their will. Once our contract ends, I can confidently say we will not work with Wrike again. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Wrike's features very good, especially the ability to create sub-tasks and assign labels. This makes things very visual and helps when a task is bigger, with multiple developers working on it. We can create sub-tasks and tackle them one by one, and assign a single sub-task to multiple developers. It's very useful for teamwork. Additionally, I appreciate that the initial setup of Wrike was very easy and we can use it easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think it would be nice if Wrike had card views, so we could create some cards and have one dashboard to arrange all the cards based on the category or something. That needs to be updated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Wrike introduces new features constantly. Especially for admins ther have been a lot of new reporting possibilities for big acounts which help a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The support becomes worth in the community. They exchanged the support team. The old one was experienced. The new one is ok, but not as good as the old one. Cost cut? Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Overall, we have been using it to integrate with Slack and we have found to help our organization's workflow to help tasks staying up to date. We use it to integrate with other tools as well. It create tasks when it finds errors on the websites we are working on from minor errors to critical errors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There isn't much from my perspective. Since we have used it to integrate with other applications we use, we have found that our company is getting more out of the subscription.

One minor complaint is seat allocation. Especially with allowing clients into the Wrike board to view tasks and progress. We have to be really selective with the seats allowed, which is fine, but sometimes it is a bit limiting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Wrike is its flexibility and ability to handle complex projects, the way they provided customizable workflows, dashboards and reporting features, it makes easier to track project status and workloads across teams and planning get easier eventually. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main thing I dislike about Wrike is that it can feel overwhelming at first glance for new users as there are lot of features and customization available which makes it difficult at initial stage as those might not be required for initial setup. Also they can improve pricing options and flexibility for smaller teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the newer things I really appreciate about Wrike is how much more intuitive and polished the interface feels. Navigation is smoother, dashboards are more customizable, and it’s much easier to tailor views to what different team members actually need to see. The improved dashboards and reporting capabilities have made it simple to track KPIs and project health in real time without having to export data elsewhere.

I’ve also been impressed with the continued enhancements to automation and workflow management. Setting up rules to automatically assign tasks, update statuses, or trigger notifications has significantly reduced manual work for our team. It helps standardize processes and keeps projects moving without constant oversight.

Additionally, the collaboration features keep getting better. The ability to comment directly within tasks, tag teammates, and share files in context really cuts down on long email threads and keeps communication centralized. Overall, the recent updates have made Wrike feel more streamlined, smarter, and more aligned with how modern teams work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’d say the onboarding experience can feel a bit overwhelming at first. The platform is extremely powerful, but that also means there’s a learning curve especially when you start working with complex automations, custom fields, and advanced workflows. It takes time (and sometimes trial and error) to fully understand how everything connects.

Another area for improvement is the mobile app. It works well for basic task management and quick updates, but it doesn’t yet offer the full depth of features available on the desktop version. For teams that rely heavily on mobile access, having more parity between desktop and mobile would make a big difference.

That said, once you get past the initial setup phase, Wrike becomes a very robust and flexible project management tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Everybody is just putting in AI features that aren't really necessary. Still feel like the previous answer was good (Wrike does a lot of things decently that I would want but nothing I can't find elsewhere). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AI. For SMB, it doesn't really make sense to use a generic white-labelled product versus generating and creating a custom environment unique to my needs. Feels like Software is moving so quickly and SaaS platforms are slow and falling behind. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Wrike feels like a complete package when it comes to project management and work collaboration tools. On top of that, it’s by far one of the most leading-edge options in terms of AI and innovation, helping revolutionize how we work every day. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Adoption can be a challenge without a strong champion team; however, Wrike offers innumerable ways to support your team, including training, webinars, and courses that help you build an approach that fits your unique situation. In my experience, the challenge is more often in the process than in the system—this is true for all platforms—but their dedication to a customer-first mentality makes them stand well above the rest. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Wrike for the flexibility it offers in structuring workflows exactly how we need them. The custom request forms are great for standardizing incoming work, ensuring we all get the necessary information. I appreciate clear task ownership as it removes confusion over who is responsible for what. Visibility across teams is another aspect I enjoy, as it enhances cross-team collaboration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI can feel heavy on huge projects, and reporting isn't always as flexible as I'd want. The setup took some time, and there's a steep learning curve compared to simpler PM software tools like Asana. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.