The UI is easy to use and user-friendly, which makes everything clear and readable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At one point, I wanted them to take into account what I’d written in my notes section, rather than relying on the answer section on the left-hand side. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Woven offered the company I interviewed with the opportunity to give me realistic scenarios, like theories on why a website was partially out, or giving feedback on a pull request, in addition to coding problems. I also really appreciated that Woven gave me actionable, meaningful feedback on my responses, which is frustratingly rare in the job application process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If we're going to live in a world in which we do remote tech screens, I think Woven is leading the charge on helpful, humane tech screens. I don't really have any complaints about Woven itself. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

They have a Straight forward interview process Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I couldn't of any downside, maybe the many information but that is not really a downside Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I was genuinely impressed by the way Woven organized the technical interview. The problems presented were practical and closely resembled real-world engineering challenges, rather than the typical leetcode or hackerrank exercises. The platform itself made it straightforward to write, run, and test my code. I also appreciated the clear instructions, the intuitive interface, and how the assessment evaluated both my problem-solving abilities and communication skills. Overall, it was one of the most engaging and fair technical interviews I have experienced. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Overall, I really enjoyed the experience, though there are a few areas that could use improvement. For example, the timer in the top right corner currently tracks the total time, but it would be more helpful if it could show the time remaining for each individual question instead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I completed a Woven assessment as part of a job interview. The assessment was clear and relevant, giving candidates the opportunity to demonstrate their real-world skills instead of just solving puzzles. It is easy to use, well-organized, and helps make the interview process feel more approachable. Overall, the experience left me feeling confident and respected as a candidate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s not much I would change. I found the Woven interface to be mostly clean and straightforward. However, when it came to the Architectural Layer Brainstorming challenge format, I felt that the strict time constraint combined with the high degree of context fragmentation made the experience less than ideal. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It was easy to use. I completed the test in two steps. The first step was a system design exercise, which really surprised me! It was the first time I had seen that, and I found it very clever. It was also really well implemented. I also received an email from customer support, which was helpful in explaining how to use the tool. It was the first time I used it, and I hope to use it with higher frequency! It was also easy to integrate with the company I was applying for. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I also loved the coding exercise, the second step of the selection process. I think the scope of the test could be a bit smaller—but not much. It would still be a very effective selection tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love how Woven presents real-world problems and scenarios that align closely with the duties of a software engineering role, providing a realistic job assessment that includes both technical and communication skills. This approach contrasts positively with more traditional interview types, where the focus might solely be on algorithm optimization, giving me a chance to debug and problem-solve as I would in the workplace. I greatly appreciate the timely and insightful feedback from real software engineers, which adds immense value to the time spent on technical assessments. Feedback from actual industry professionals helps me improve and see the practical worth in the effort invested. Moreover, Woven's built-in IDE is incredibly user-friendly, further enhancing my experience by making the technical process more accessible and less daunting. The initial setup was straightforward, facilitated by a comprehensive prep guide that allowed me to jump right into the assessment seamlessly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I had 4 problems to solve throughout my assessment, and for one of them, I was unable to see the time remaining. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Finally, a tool that tests a user based on real-world experiences, simulating actual work. They simulated analytical skills to debug some code with vague information, which was really fun. The second part asked me to code something with the help of AI, and it was really well-designed. While the code was easy to work with, they wanted to know what your process is with creating that code and what efforts you put in to create working code. It's really easy to use. I can see this replacing the current LeetCode assessments, as LeetCode is less valuable than actual working knowledge of real-world experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, none I can think of. Maybe their IDE could be better. The code writing doesn't seem right to me; it has weird typing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Woven assessment is truly unique, it's the first of its kind that I've encountered. It presents real-world problems and evaluates genuine engineering skills, focusing on how a developer thinks, writes code, and approaches problem-solving. The emphasis is on performance and practical abilities, rather than guesswork or theoretical knowledge. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The assessment included several tasks that seemed lengthy for the early stages, and I think there should be an option to complete any missed details. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I took a Woven assessment as part of a job interview. It tested what it's like to actually do work, which seems about a million times better than live coding algorithms. I think this is a much more accurate reflection of my abilities as an engineer, Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The code editor needs some love. Even though I took time to get acquainted with the editor before the assessment, it was still difficult to work with and I was unable to close a tab after opening it, which made for a cluttered work space. This slowed me down and detracted from my ability to complete challenges within the allotted time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.