We've been using Woven for more than 4 years. Recently we added a new assesment for Full Stack Software Engineers. Their representatives took the time to understand our requirements and it was super easy to implement and use! Our managers are very happy with the results and recommendations from Woven. It has improved our quality of hire and I highly recommend Woven Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We have not found any downsides to using Woven. No issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I took a Woven assessment as part of a job interview.

Things I liked best about Woven:

- Great quality real world scenarios that are very likely to occur in your day to day life as a software developer.

- Fast response times

- Detailed feedback report with actionable insights. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing. I don't have any dislikes. Entire process was very smooth, with clear instructions and much better real world scenarios than traditional Leetcode style questions in interviews. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform was very easy to use and test Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The time limit was very short and could be extended Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I HIGHLY prefer Woven's system for skill assessment over many of the other preliminary skill assessments Ive taken for software development jobs in the past. It feels much less like an arbitrary test and more like an actual simulation of software development work. It's engaging in the way that software development always is, and less like trying to meet vague expectations of a personality/IQ test. Its open-book nature in particular is a much better fit: software development is much less about what you know off the top of your head and more about knowing where to look to find what you need, and other skill assessments do not reflect this. (While actual software development doesnt require you to cite the stackoverflow pages you used, this is hardly a bother and a good compromise to prevent outright cheating) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I suppose it could be a bit clearer if the timer ends before you click the button, that what you have is still submitted. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I liked most about Woven was how realistic and thoughtfully designed the assessment was. Instead of solving abstract puzzles, I was given challenges that felt relevant to actual engineering work. The three scenarios I worked through were genuinely challenging and made me think deeply not just about the code, but about how I approach problems and make decisions.

It felt like a much more accurate and fair way to evaluate real-world skills. I also appreciated the professional feedback I received at the end, it showed that the process was structured and that my work was being reviewed seriously. Overall, it was one of the best interview experiences I have had in a long time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only downside for me was that the assessment was a bit time-consuming compared to typical coding tests. While I appreciated the depth and realism, setting aside that much uninterrupted time can be tough, especially when you're juggling multiple interview processes. That said, I still think the time investment is worth it, especially given how much more meaningful the results are. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Comfortable environment and reasonable workspace Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some bug in the coding section and hard to read the problems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like woven's approach to evaluating and assessing technical skills which doesn't involve all those coding puzzles that do little to evaluate actual skills necessary in day to day work. Woven's assessments mirrors real-world scenarios more accurately than traditional quizzes or coding puzzles. It also helps hiring teams identify talent that aligns with the demands of the role, creating a much fairer and more efficient recruitment process. Woven doesn't just test—they measure potential. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While I think Woven does a lot better than other assessment platforms in terms of providing clear instructions before a test, I think Woven can do better in terms of improving its feedback loop. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I recently completed another Woven assignment as part of a job interview, and once again, it stood out as one of the most practical and relevant assessments I’ve done. Unlike algorithm-heavy coding rounds, this assignment focused on tasks that closely mirror real-world scenarios—reviewing a GitHub repository and writing production-quality code. It was a thoughtful way to evaluate problem-solving, technical communication, and decision-making in a realistic setting. I truly appreciate this kind of approach, and I hope more companies continue to adopt interview processes that reflect the day-to-day responsibilities of the role. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

During my experience I did not find anything to dislike. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A real-life coding assessment. I really liked it! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There was not much time for questions. but it was okay. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are quite a few things that I like

- White glove setup experience - Wes, Ryan, and Shayna understood our needs and setup a customized assessment template for us. They suggested assessments based on our needs and we only had to select the ones we liked the most.

- Very fast response times - The assessments are graded within a day. Shayna and team are also very quick to respond to our questions / requests. They setup a dedicated Slack channel for us.

- The team is honest and open to feedback - If we raise issues with the assessments or a particular candidate's score, Wes and team are extremely supportive. They re-grade, share their perspective and understand ours. This has happened only once but it was a great experience for us.

- I have found the exercises to be of excellent quality. The team also has good benchmarks for acceptable scores and time limits.

- I especially like the human grading which allows for nuanced and open-ended exercises rather than just a right or wrong.

- I also like the breadth of exercises that are available to choose from - coding, architecture, writing, troubleshooting, etc.

- The platform is extremely simple to use. We were up and running in just a few hours.

- Shayna also very helpfully setup time to train our recruiters on how to manage candidates and interviews.

- Pricing is also favorable. They charge by the hires not the assessments. Given this, we can turbo charge our recruiting efforts by evaluating a lot of candidates through their platform. This allows us to consider a wider set of candidates than if the assessment was all human. In a way this is even better than automated platforms because in those a human (likely a dev team member) still needs to review the submissions. Woven does all this for us and frees up the dev team to focus on candidates who are most likely to be successful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would like to see a wider set of exercises to choose from. Woven has many customers and sometimes candidates have already taken one or more of the exercises with another customer. Woven does have a good formula to weight the overall scores based on how long ago the candidate has taken the same exercise. However, the less this happens the better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.