I love how Woven presents real-world problems and scenarios that align closely with the duties of a software engineering role, providing a realistic job assessment that includes both technical and communication skills. This approach contrasts positively with more traditional interview types, where the focus might solely be on algorithm optimization, giving me a chance to debug and problem-solve as I would in the workplace. I greatly appreciate the timely and insightful feedback from real software engineers, which adds immense value to the time spent on technical assessments. Feedback from actual industry professionals helps me improve and see the practical worth in the effort invested. Moreover, Woven's built-in IDE is incredibly user-friendly, further enhancing my experience by making the technical process more accessible and less daunting. The initial setup was straightforward, facilitated by a comprehensive prep guide that allowed me to jump right into the assessment seamlessly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I had 4 problems to solve throughout my assessment, and for one of them, I was unable to see the time remaining. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Finally, a tool that tests a user based on real-world experiences, simulating actual work. They simulated analytical skills to debug some code with vague information, which was really fun. The second part asked me to code something with the help of AI, and it was really well-designed. While the code was easy to work with, they wanted to know what your process is with creating that code and what efforts you put in to create working code. It's really easy to use. I can see this replacing the current LeetCode assessments, as LeetCode is less valuable than actual working knowledge of real-world experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, none I can think of. Maybe their IDE could be better. The code writing doesn't seem right to me; it has weird typing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Woven assessment is truly unique, it's the first of its kind that I've encountered. It presents real-world problems and evaluates genuine engineering skills, focusing on how a developer thinks, writes code, and approaches problem-solving. The emphasis is on performance and practical abilities, rather than guesswork or theoretical knowledge. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The assessment included several tasks that seemed lengthy for the early stages, and I think there should be an option to complete any missed details. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I liked that the assessment was straightforward and didn’t feel overwhelming. The instructions were clear, and the whole flow felt organized enough that I didn’t have to guess what to do next. It also loads fast and doesn’t make you jump through unnecessary hoops, which I appreciated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some parts felt a bit generic, and a couple questions could use more context. I also think the UI could look a little more modern. None of it was a deal breaker, but there’s definitely room for the platform to feel smoother. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like that Woven focuses on real-world engineering scenarios instead of tricky algorithm puzzles. The assessment felt like an actual day on the job — debugging issues, integrating APIs, and improving code quality. It tested my practical problem-solving skills in a fair and professional way. The feedback at the end was detailed and constructive, which helped me understand my strengths and where I could improve. Overall, it felt like a genuine evaluation of how developers work in real projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There wasn’t much to dislike, but I did find that some tasks felt a bit time-constrained — especially when trying to write clean, production-quality code while also debugging. It would be great if Woven provided a short practice round or preview so candidates can get familiar with the environment before starting. Aside from that, the experience was smooth and well-organized. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate that the tasks given to assess candidates are well-designed and based on real-time scenarios. I also like how the platform emphasizes building and production situations, which makes the experience more practical. Additionally, the platform is reliable, offering web previews that clearly show how the code functions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The builds and installation of dependencies can be somewhat slow, and at times the web interface does not respond well. However, I really appreciate the dark mode and find the failure messages helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Woven because it makes submitting applications painless and predictable — my resume and materials arrive exactly as I intended, without weird formatting or missing metadata. That reliability saves time for me and for hiring teams like Digital Harbor, and it makes follow-ups and clarifications straightforward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don’t like that once an application is submitted it can feel a bit opaque — limited visibility into status and few options to update or tweak materials if something needs fixing. The notifications are often generic and impersonal, which makes it harder to know whether a hiring team like Digital Harbor actually reviewed my files or needs clarification. The platform’s strict file rules can also be frustrating when you just need to attach a slightly different version of a document. Overall it’s reliable for delivery, but the post-submit flexibility and personalized communication could be better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Woven offers a very smooth and realistic technical assessment experience that feels close to real-world DevOps and software engineering tasks. The platform provides clear problem statements, helpful context, and an intuitive interface that keeps everything organized from coding to scenario based questions. I also like how the assignments test both coding and critical thinking, not just syntax or the algorithms. The review feedback process is transparent, and the interface runs efficiently without lags or the crashes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main aspect that could use improvement is the clarity of instructions in some of the more advanced assessments. Occasionally, candidates may benefit from having extra examples or more validation options before submitting their answers. Additionally, incorporating automatic feedback or partial test scoring during practice sessions would further enhance the overall experience. Other than these points, I find everything else from the user interface to the design of the questions excellent and highly realistic for assessing professional skills. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We enjoy the simplicity of the topic content of the programming challenges because it's not so industry specific that it acts as a blocker for new candidates. We have found that candidates are able to quickly understand the business context of the question and get to programming. We also like the fact that this is an easy tool for our development team to implement and use to evaluate talent. Keeping it simple is best. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We would like to see additional types of topics asked to get into some other legacy product types. Things like WCF, WebForms, Microsoft SQL Server, etc. are a few areas that could use some help. We say that because not all code out there is the shinny new Angular/React/Vue.js code and we still need developers with a wide range of skills. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Woven’s scenarios felt realistic and relevant to the job. The tasks were thoughtfully designed to evaluate actual problem-solving and communication skills rather than memorization or test tricks. I appreciated the detailed, actionable feedback after the assessment was reviewed, and the opportunity to see how my work compared to other candidates. The platform was stable, intuitive, and easy to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is not much to dislike, really. The time limits can feel tight, but they effectively simulate real-world pressure and prioritization. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.