Vantage Pricing Overview

We use Vantage several times a week to monitor our cloud expenditure. We like being able to centralize our cost and usage data from both AWS and Azure, with options for more integrations as our organization grows. Integrating accounts is quite straightforward. The user interface is intuitive and lets us quickly identify anomalies and drill down into where our costs are being generated. Easier to use than the corresponding reports on AWS or Azure. Customer support has been very responsive on the rare occasion we needed them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The recently introduced Network Flow reports can be a bit tricky to enable, and the reports themselves can be unintuitive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Flexibility to add tags based on custom rules. This allows us to not be too strict in our tagging strategy in our CloudProvider and fill any gaps with custom logic afterwards.

We mainly use vantage to split bills in shared environments based on usage using "Virtual tags" with cost-based values . This worked way better than e.g. with kubecost. It's not perfect for this use case, but it works good enough. It's great, that those split costs can then be inspected in the cost reports.

The great support for Terraform and the API is a big plus for us as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

* The usage of virtual tags, especially when multiple of those are involved or in the case of cost-based values can become complicated.

* Some custom rules, like adding a fixed amount to a bill are not supported at all.

* The drill-down functionality in cost-reports does not always select the most useful dimension to drill down into. But it's still pretty good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.