Tines Pricing Overview

edit

Free Trial

Community Edition

Free

For experimenting with Tines

Starter Edition

Starting at $500.00

2 builders Per Month

For beginning with AI and automation

Business and Enterprise

For a complete intelligent workflow strategy

At Tines we believe in simplicity, and our pricing model reflects that. We offer our always free community edition and our paid edition.

Community Edition
Our community edition is a playground for potential customers or tech enthusiasts to experiment with Tines. It's great for getting started with Tines and demonstrating the value internally before committing to a contract. This is a fixed package – for any additional features or capacity, you must upgrade to a paid plan.

Paid plans
Paid plans include additional features and capacity to allow customers the freedom to build. Within our paid plans we introduced feature tiering based on the needs for an account.

Tines has 3 pricing editions. A free trial of Tines is also available. Look at different pricing editions below and see what edition and features meet your budget and needs.

Pricing information for Tines is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase Tines must be conducted with the seller.

Pricing information was last updated on April 28, 2026

Tines Pricing FAQs

Generated using AI

According to G2 reviewers, Tines's pricing is best suited for Mid-Market and Enterprise security and IT teams that handle high volumes of repetitive workflows and alert triage. G2 reviews from industries including Computer and Network Security, Financial Services, Information Technology, and Media Production highlight strong adoption across these segments. The Starter Edition appeals to small businesses beginning their automation journey, while Business and Enterprise tiers serve larger organizations needing unlimited builders, multiple teams, and dedicated support. G2 reviewers from small businesses occasionally flag pricing as a barrier, suggesting Tines's pricing structure delivers the most value to organizations with mature, security-focused automation needs.

Tines's Community Edition is free and limited to 1 builder and 3 flows, making it suitable only for experimentation. G2 reviewers frequently highlight this story cap as the primary driver for upgrading. Tines's paid Starter Edition begins at $500/month and expands to 2-5 builders, 5-20 flows, and 2,500 AI run-time credits, with flexible monthly or annual billing. Tines's Business and Enterprise tiers unlock unlimited builders, additional AI credits, enhanced functionality, multiple teams, dedicated support, training, and flexible hosting. G2 reviewers note the Community Edition provides genuine value for evaluation, but growing teams quickly outgrow its limitations.

Tines is widely regarded as a premium but worthwhile investment. G2 reviewers consistently give it high ratings, with many citing strong ROI through time savings, reduced manual effort, and faster incident response. Reviewers from Mid-Market and Enterprise segments frequently describe Tines as cost-effective compared to alternatives like Splunk SOAR and Cortex. However, pricing concerns surface repeatedly, particularly among small businesses and startups, with G2 users noting it can feel expensive for smaller teams or lighter use cases. One reviewer noted enterprise pricing starting at $50,000+. The consensus among G2 reviewers is that Tines delivers clear value for security-focused teams, but smaller organizations may need to carefully evaluate ROI before committing.

Top-Rated Alternatives

View All Alternatives

Tines Pricing Reviews

(2)

Verified User in Computer & Network Security

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

7/25/2023

"Good No Code SOAR Platform"

5/5

What do you like best about Tines?

Elastic and Tines new offering of AIOps

Also, prebuilt bidirectional connections between Elastic SIEM and Tines is too good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Tines?

1. Pricing model is still not that flexible.

2. Ticketing feature isn't great. Needs improvement to interact with multiple teams and should support assignee, assignment team, etc Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Computer & Network Security

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

4/17/2026

"Powerful, Flexible Automation But Complex Workflows Need Better Navigation and Debugging"

3.5/5

What do you like best about Tines?

Tines stands out for its intuitive UI/UX combined with powerful automation capabilities. The drag-and-drop workflow builder makes it easy to design, visualize, and troubleshoot complex processes without needing heavy coding, which significantly reduces development time. At the same time, it still allows for deep customization when needed, striking a great balance between simplicity and flexibility.

The platform’s integration capabilities are a major strength it connects seamlessly with a wide range of tools and APIs, making it highly adaptable across different use cases. This has helped streamline workflows and eliminate repetitive manual tasks, improving overall efficiency.

Performance wise, Tines is reliable and scalable. Even with complex workflows and higher volumes of events, execution remains consistent and predictable, which is critical in production environments.

Another highlight is the strong ROI. By automating routine processes, it saves significant time and reduces operational overhead, allowing teams to focus on higher-value work.

Finally, the support and onboarding experience have been solid, with helpful documentation and responsive assistance when needed. The platform is also continuously evolving, with new features (including AI-driven capabilities) that enhance automation and decision-making over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Tines?

While Tines is a powerful platform, there are a few areas where it could improve. The UI is intuitive for simpler workflows, but as workflows grow in complexity it can feel cluttered and become harder to navigate. When managing large automation pipelines, it can take extra effort to keep everything organized and to debug issues, and stronger visualization and structuring tools would help.

On integrations, Tines supports a wide range of APIs, but some connectors still require manual configuration. For teams expecting more out-of-the-box integrations, this can increase initial setup time.

Performance is generally reliable, but debugging and tracing problems in complex workflows can sometimes be time-consuming, especially when multiple actions depend on each other.

From a pricing standpoint, it may be less accessible for smaller teams or organizations, particularly as usage scales. A more flexible pricing model could improve accessibility and ROI for growing teams.

Support is helpful, but onboarding for new users could be smoother, especially for people without prior experience with automation tools. More guided templates or clearer learning paths would make adoption easier.

Finally, while the AI capabilities are evolving, there is still room for deeper integration of intelligent automation features to reduce manual intervention further and improve decision-making. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is Tines solving and how is that benefiting you?

Before using Tines, a lot of our workflows involved manual intervention, fragmented tooling, and repeated effort across systems. Tasks like monitoring events, triggering actions, and coordinating between different platforms required significant human effort, which increased response times and the risk of errors.

With Tines, we’ve been able to centralize and automate these processes through structured workflows. It allows us to connect multiple systems seamlessly and trigger actions in real time, eliminating repetitive manual work. This has significantly improved operational efficiency and consistency across workflows.

One of the biggest benefits has been faster response and resolution times. Automated workflows ensure that critical actions are executed instantly without delays, which is especially valuable in time-sensitive scenarios. Additionally, it has reduced dependency on manual oversight, allowing the team to focus on more strategic and high-value tasks.

From a scalability perspective, Tines enables us to handle increasing volumes of events without a proportional increase in effort. What previously required multiple people or constant monitoring can now be managed through automation, leading to better resource utilization.

Overall, Tines has helped streamline operations, reduce errors, and improve productivity, delivering clear ROI through time savings and more efficient workflow management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.