Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Product Avatar Image
G2 recognized threatER
threatER

By threatER

4.8 out of 5 stars
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%

How would you rate your experience with threatER?

threatER Reviews & Product Details

Pricing

Pricing provided by threatER.

EnforceDNS Essential

Starting at $20.00
20 Users Per Month

threatER Media

threatER Demo - Threater Enforce Admin
View of Report within the Threater Admin Console
threatER Demo - Threater Enforce Admin (2)
View of Report within the Threater Admin Console
threatER Demo - Threater Collect
View of Collect (free service) within the Threater Admin Console
Product Avatar Image

Have you used threatER before?

Answer a few questions to help the threatER community

threatER Reviews (28)

Reviews

threatER Reviews (28)

4.8
28 reviews

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Verified User in Utilities
AU
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Hands-Off Network Security, Minimal Manual Interventions"
What do you like best about threatER?

I like that Threater is more of a hands-off security application once it is set up. It's very easy to administer, which I find particularly beneficial. The initial setup was very easy, making the transition smooth. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about threatER?

A lot of legitimate sites get added to the auto threat lists, which causes us to manually have to go in and whitelist the IP addresses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Courtney Brady of threatER

Thank you for the review and we appreciate the feedback.

We are aware of unintended blocks occurring and know it almost always happens in the cloud where a specific website shares an IP with thousands of others. We do our best to mitigate and quickly respond with additional threat intel so that it doesn't happen with that site again.

Here is some additional information if that happens again: https://support.threatblockr.com/hc/en-us/articles/4407480803092.

Thank you again for being a trusted ThreatBlockr customer!

See how threatER improved
RC
Infrastructure Admin
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Easy-to-Use Interface, Though Some Features Feel Redundant on Firewalls"
What do you like best about threatER?

Interface is easy to navigate between sites Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about threatER?

redundant features available on firewalls Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Gregory Z.
GZ
Computer System Administrator
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Easy On-Site Setup and Installation That Just Works"
What do you like best about threatER?

They were easy to have set up and installed on site. Works like they should. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about threatER?

pulling reports and unexpected block reports are a little slow, but manageable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Financial Services
UF
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Threatblockr Is A Game-Changer In The Cybersecurity Field!"
What do you like best about threatER?

We've been using Threatblockr for over five years, which has met all our cybersecurity needs. We are incredibly pleased with its performance. The software is easy to use and navigate. It has proven to be very effective in protecting our devices and personal information from potential threats by blocking all non-domestic traffic and all the threat lists we subscribe to. One of the features I appreciate the most is the real-time blocking and the ability to view the logs in real-time. The customer support team has also been very helpful in answering any questions we have had. I highly recommend Threatblockr to anyone looking for reliable and user-friendly cybersecurity solutions to simply block malicious traffic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about threatER?

A few things that I would recommend is to be able to drill down in more detail on the specific traffic that is being allowed and blocked. It would be nice to have a more interactive dashboard to try and see what IPs are doing with particular features (i.e., Blocked by Reason, Blocked by Category, Blocked by Country, and Blocked by ASN). It would be beneficial to look into this data to identify the traffic without looking at the exported logs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dane Z.
DZ
Information Security Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"ThreatBlockr is the best bump-in-the-wire IP/URL reputation security appliance I've ever used!"
What do you like best about threatER?

The ability to ingest, aggregate, and take action based on different threat reputation and open-source feeds using STIX/TAXII and web .txt URLs.

This is something only a combination of SIEM/SOAR/UTM/TIP solutions could do.

Often this combination focuses on enrichment and IOC hunting, but it was difficult to ever take this information and compile it into a meaningful reputation block list that an NGFW could then ingest and take action with. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about threatER?

Centralized logging of the different appliances' web activities such as their blocking behavior requires a SIEM or centralized Syslog server.

It doesn't allow for centralized searching of these logs via the SaaS portal. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Legal Services
AL
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"ThreatBlockr IP based block list management is quick, easy and reliable protection"
What do you like best about threatER?

Ease of management and powerful block lists are available, customer support is one of the best I've ever dealt with. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about threatER?

Does not support Entra SSO yet, no DNS whitelist feature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dalton R.
DR
IT Lead Infrastructure & Security Analyst
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"One of the best appliances you never knew you needed!"
What do you like best about threatER?

We've had a ThreatBlockr device ever since I arrived at my organization almost 7 years ago. It was brought in by my now senior manager and I would never deploy another site without one.

This appliance allows such an easy way to do geoblocking, it is incredible, point, click, save. Need to see if the country is blocked? No problem just type it in.

Allows me with pinpoint accuracy to adjust what I want in and out of my network before it even gets to my firewall with simple sliders. I get full control over how much risk I want to take with which ASNs. Need to allow some ASN traffic but want to make sure a slight deviation in the threat score blocks it? No problem, you adjust the slider from 0 to 100 or -100.

Solid insights on threat levels of malicious IPs/Websites.

Whitelist/Blacklisting lists are super simple to use.

Plus ThreatBlockr has a ton of out-of-the-box content lists you can link to.

I've also dabbled in having a dynamic list linked to a Google doc that I can update an IP or Website I want blocked into the Google doc and it transverses to the policy seamlessly.

With the GMC portal I can get single pane of glass review of both my devices across both our ISPs in front of our HA'd firewalls.

Support is top-notch as well, which is great, but I've rarely had to use it.

Updating is a breeze! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about threatER?

My biggest gripe is when the Threatblockr is restricting a site, there is no splash page like OpenDNS/Umbrella. Also if Im Geoblocking a certain country and the website is coming from there and I run a search inside the GMC, it won't tell me if it is in a blocked country or not, kind of slows me down.

Otherwise the interface is rock solid. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

PD
Director of IT
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Extremely Simple & Effective Network Protection"
What do you like best about threatER?

The appliances are effortless to deploy, configure, and maintain. We can quickly look up log data on each device individually when we suspect something may be getting blocked. Their reports clearly illustrate the importance of the service to leadership. Using ThreatBlockr appliances between our UTMs and our WAN connections have allowed us to offload much of the load that our UTMs would have needed to process if they were connected directly to the Internet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about threatER?

Sometimes, the threat lists block shared webserver IPs, resulting in false positive blocking of legitimate websites. Because of where we position the appliances in our topology, I can't easily see what specific hosts on our internal network are trying to access so we often have to compare ThreatBlockr logs to UTM logs to get the full picture. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Courtney Brady of threatER

Thank you for your honest review! We very much agree that depending on where ThreatBlockr is deployed, especially when deployed outside your next generation firewall or UTM element (i.e., closest to the Internet), we can only see the NAT'd IP on the protected side. You're absolutely right that the only recourse to determine which protected side resource is involved is to cross check against your other security elements (i.e., the initial NAT'ing point). We find the best way for customers to handle that when they can do so is to leverage our built-in Syslog Export capability, sending our detailed logs to a SIEM or SIEM-like system of our customers' choosing, where they'd also have their UTM or equivalent logs present, and then do the correlation there.

You're also correct in stating that false positives can (and do!) occur. It's a challenge when you can block millions of IPs in real time like our platform allows - we know of no other platform in the world that can ingest so much third party data and never adversely impact performance. Since so many of our data intelligence partners leverage advanced detection schemes including leveraging AI systems, false positives are bound to happen. We're always looking at ways to improve false positive mitigation (we like to call them unexpected blocks), and one great way to do it is to leverage our Allowed Lists, which are easy to update in manual fashion and/or via API if you have the wherewithal to do so. Unlike many other platforms, there's NO limit to the amount of allowed list data that you can ingest, create, and use. On that note, our Customer Success team is always ready and willing to assist you in any way with this - please never hesitate to reach out to them!

And again, thank you for your honest review!

FC
Network Systems Analyst
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Works well, intuitive interface and support is great"
What do you like best about threatER?

The easy configuration and setup. Support is responsive and knowledgeable. Does not slow down internet connection and protects both inbound and outbound traffic separately. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about threatER?

The logging tab is helpful but requires a page refresh when editing the query or wanting to update the list. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AW
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Great product"
What do you like best about threatER?

ThreatBlockr is a great product capable of numerous use cases and handling millions of packets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about threatER?

I can't think of anything negative it does its job well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No Discussions for This Product Yet

Be the first to ask a question and get answers from real users and experts.

Start a discussion

Pricing Options

Pricing provided by threatER.

EnforceDNS Essential

Starting at $20.00
20 Users Per Month

EnforceDNS Preferred

Starting at $60.00
30 Users Per Month

EnforceDNS Premium

Starting at $300.00
100 Users Per Month
threatER Comparisons
Product Avatar Image
FortiGate IPS
Compare Now
threatER Features
Administration Console -
Intrusion Prevention
Security Monitoring
Product Avatar Image
Product Avatar Image
threatER