I've used The Predictive Index for almost two years now and it's a very useful and progressive software that helps pinpoint what drives specific employees because everyone thinks differently and is motivated differently. It's extremely helpful for managers in learning what type of work style they thrive in, and also how two people may best work together. It's very easy to use for the test-taker as well as the person issuing the testing and reading the results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't have any issues with it at the moment. If I think of anything I will let you know. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

PI is a simple and convenient behavioral assessment tool that allows candidates and employees to complete a quick assessment that produces accurate results. We use the data to tailor our interviews with candidates and new employee onboarding. The data also helps our teams understand how to best communicate and work together. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the reports are generic and could apply to anyone. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is spot on when it explains the innate traits behind the individual. Sharing PI profiles as a manager and employee perspective outlines each persons traits and defines the best approaches in communication, coaching, learning etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

taking the results from the job profile and creating the best spread for the role based on the individuals feedback. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is a great way to help round out your hiring needs and offering another thought process when choosing the correct candidate. It also allows you to build teams and see how cohesive those teams may be and some stratergies for assisting with reaching team goals. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are some limitations with the team creation and sometimes the language is a bit general. Would like to see more hands on activities created from the PI. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

PI is a concise and compelling behavioural assessment tool that provides an unbiased assessment of candidates. If you are not using a scientifically validated behavioural assessment method like PI, what are you using exactly? I think all fair hiring requires a validated toolset and PI, with proper training, is very effective. The pricing model is also spot on. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel like they should have an edition that is strictly for knowledge workers and management roles. More specifically, the cognitive assessment benchmarking sometimes includes questions about manual labour, which feels out of place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'm an assessments veteran and PI is one of the most accurate, but also one of the easiest to understand. Managers can easily figure out what the report is saying. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The backend admin management isn't the best in the world. PI has made a lot of improvements lately but there's more that can be done. They also don't integrate natively with popular HRIS/ATS tools, which is a missed opportunity that leads to a lot of manual work (export/import reports). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Predictive Index is the best! It is so easy to use and has been essential for building our team starting with Design to figure out what kind of team we were to using it to identify who/where we needed to hire. Kat and the PI team were so helpful in getting our team set up on how to use PI. Once we got rolling, it was so easy to use. Hire has been our biggest flex of the year in our hiring process. It not only makes the hiring process a breeze and helps identify the most qualified candidates, it also provides amazing questions to use during the interview process. Additionally, Inspire has helped our team learn how to communicate with one another better and grow both individually and as a team. There has not been a day in the last year where I haven't either referred to PI or accessed it! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing. It has become an essential part of our team's toolbox. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The accuracy of the results from a very easy to take survey. It makes convincing people to take it easier Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Filtering job targets is something that’s missing. Also it’s too hard to have someone retake a self-concept Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have been an analyst using the Pi tool for11 years now and I absolutely love it! I have worked with many other behavioral tools and Pi is by far the most "inclusive". Also an awesome tool for team building! I have conducted over 7000 surveys myself and absolutely love it! We have incorporated the Pi into our company culture and all of the courses that we design so Pi is becoming a way of lif for our team members and leaders... Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The software and platform has improved so much over the years from graphics, dowloads, and integrated capabilities. I don't really have any major complaints except for the Teams functions within the Talent Optimization tool and its tracking and reporting. Maybe allow larger Analytics team sizes up to 50? Also make connecting Pi assesments or duplicates easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As an internal team consultant, I appreciate the PI website - it's easy to send links to assessment takers, organize teams using folders, and run/send/download reports as needed. Very user friendly and pretty intuitive. My users really appreciate - actually, are amazed by - how much the assessment "gets them" based on only a few questions. Also the reports are quite user friendly which helps individuals increase their self-awareness and make the insights actionable for themselves and with those they work with. We have an awesome PI consultant who helps our internal team continuously improve in our understanding and delivery of the product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is a little clunky to run/send/download reports for a group of participants. Some of the reports are too similarly named, causing confusion for users ("Management Development Report" and "Management Strategy Guide" for example..."Placard" isn't a useful title either). Personal and Management Development Guides are essentially the same, duplicative and confusing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.