For us it is the perfect fit as it supports our VDI-only infrastructure as well as all of our applications. From my experience it really is a one-solution fits it all automation product as I can automate any of our applications now that I've learned about visual cues and how to use them. This saves a lot of time and automating tests for a new application is a matter of days instead of weeks or months we previously had.

The stability of the execution is impressive. The approach is radically different and allows changes in the UI without any maintenance required. I love the domain object driven approach in which we don't need to try to find identifiers for fields but can model our domain objects and TestResults takes care of finding the correct fields.

Implementation was done by the TestResults team as part of a PoC within a week. We provided some input on security and enterprise readiness. With all of our points being address within 3 months after PoC I would also like to say, that this tool now fits in our secured enterprise environment.

G2 asked for frequency of use: Daily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As the approach is radically different, I really had to reset my way of automation. It is easy now, but when I first started it took me two days to really get started. Support and training was good, and I love the approach now, but again, be aware, you need to re-think. What worked for me: Start fresh, don't try to build on existing know-how. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Quick learning curve. 2 test cases with 50 steps each and about 20 screens, I automated in 3 days. Without prior knowledge of TestResults. And the tests are now running stably. Before, 3-4 out of 10 executions failed, with TestResults there wasn't a single flaky test run. And the execution time has been halved. A test case that previously took 10 minutes to execute now runs through in less than 5 minutes with TestResults. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One must rethink, as automation works quite differently than with the frameworks I am familiar with. But the learning curve is very fast. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I‘m using TestResults on a daily basis since two years already and I love how the functions got expanded since then. It‘s very intuitive to use, so we never had struggles onboarding new users at our company. Last but no least, I highly appreciate their top notch support, within a couple of hours I‘m getting the help I need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It‘s not always easy to understand the reason behind when something is not working. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to use. Robust. Anyone can use it (prompting to automate test cases step by step). No programming required. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Everything can be tested but Windows machine needed for automating test cases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best thing for me about TestResults.io is that I was looking for something that was as flexible and in depth as Selenium but without all the time in upkeep of test scripts every time a change/update was made on a page. TestResults.io did this for me. I was able to get up and running in no time as well as receive top notch support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing that I would like to see a little easier to change is Test Case names. Sometimes you accidentally have a naming convention that needs to be changed, or a test case name is too similar to another. Maybe I'm not up to speed with the best way to do it but it would be nice to make a change in the Test Case Designer and have it make the changes to all the necessary places downstream. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What they call "visual steering" is really helpful, because when we make changes in our websites their product can still test everything. I.e. the logic doesn't break. Their team helped us onboard quickly and get value from the product very fast. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's Windows only (no Mac)... but I guess that's fine Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a financial enterprise with over 500 employees, we use testresults.io for our automated testing — with great success. The platform stands out with its intuitive user interface, which enabled our embedded testers to become productive in a very short time. The learning curve was minimal, and the efficiency gains were significant.

A key requirement for us was the integration into our existing systems under strict security standards. testresults.io met these requirements to our complete satisfaction — both technically and conceptually.

What truly sets testresults.io apart is its support: fast, competent, and solution-oriented. Every inquiry was met with a reliable and practical response. That’s exactly what we expect from a partner at the enterprise level. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only drawback we've experienced is the dependency on Microsoft Visual Studio. This introduces some additional effort in terms of Microsoft support coordination and license management, which needs to be accounted for Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- intuitive and user-friendly interface

- powerful support for end-to-end testing across different platofrms and technologies

- great reporting and analytics

- flexible integration options with CI/CD pipelines Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At the moment I have no remarks on that. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When we were looking for a new tool, we chose TestResults.io because it offers IQ/OQ licenses. These licenses were crucial for us as they best meet our requirements in the field.

During the migration, it became clear that the tests with TestResults.io now run much faster (up to 40% faster in some cases) than with the previous automation tool. This leads to significantly higher efficiency in test executions in the field. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At the moment, I have no comment/remarks on that. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

TestResults.io offers strong capabilities for image-recognition-based automation use cases. It stands out from competitors by using a feature-rich and widely known scripting/programming language, making it easy for developers familiar with .NET environments to get started with test automation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While generally effective, object recognition can show occasional inconsistencies Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.