Its a very useful tool for beginning in the field of QA. You can import a lot of stuff into Testlink. You can even link your JIRA bugs to a special test case. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It was kind of a tedious and time consuming task to work on TestLink. Add to this, it was very slow to navigate the entire software. This was couple of years back, so I am not sure if this slowness still exists. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Custom fields, Requirements and automatic testcase generation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'm waiting response about testlink's forum registration..I sent request 5 day ago...

New custom fields not available on existings test cases.

Why not ask users about action to do on existing testcase and, if it's required, a default value to set new field for existing testcases?)

No "regression test" management.

Mandatory test assigment to tester: no roundrobin about executing test.

No user (tester..) groups.

No mode to ensure only one test excecution.

No information about how link testcase vs ticket on BST.

Maybe I can to it only in test execution, I don't found anything about "...this testcase is related with these tickets on BTS..."

No clear information about what I can do on my BTS via testlink integration and viceversa.. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Need to Deliver the software with 90% Quality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Need to give enough time for testing the project or prdouct Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Its feature rich has all important features required by a QA manager from Tracking requirements to mapping test cases with requirements, build execution tracking every release and its reports Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing as a open source it serves the purpose very well Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Open source and ease of use. We can get all the help from forum Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Load balancing and graphs are not good enough to understand Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. It's complexity and customizability. Remembering, this is a freeware, it give plenty of opportunities to adjust to the requirements.

2. It's free

3. Integration with bug tracking systems - JIRA, TFS

4. Support - short respond time on issues, transparent Mantis bug tracking. Kudos for them!

I've worked with TestLink in couple of companies, running projects of various size and scope - it always proved to be product good enough to cover most of test management requirements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. For the first time use, and long after, it's not too intuitive in use

2. No option to link requirements with external systems (like JIRA)

3. No PDFed reports (also customizing reports could be extended)

4. I never liked the idea of Builds fixed to Test Plans - maintenance and reporting gets tricky with that Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am using TestLink 1.9.5.. its simply superb... we have customized it according to our requirements. Its working very good....its very easy to use...Since its open source tool we can customize it like anything.... I just love this tool. We use it in our company, and have done for a number of years. The out of the box customization is superb, and we have only minorly edited the configuration at all - we have a custom status of "not applicable" as a number of our tests only run on certain platforms. The instructions for doing this are included in the custom config examples and are easy to follow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Very poor support for Administration of attributes. This product needs lots of work in order to provide the data management support. It made not for a large amount of tests; some repeated looping and pure database design slows down test loading and saving for execution statuses. If you have more than 2000 tests per project, this tool is not for you. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Number of features. I very link issue tracker integration and REST API. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GUI is a little bit older, and sometimes there are issues with IE 11 Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We decided to use testlink because it was for free and we liked its UI. It was quite simple to use for users and our QA didn't experienced any problem with it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes I experienced problem with server communication and it leaded to error and I lost all the data I had created.

I would appreciate better connection between testlink and our BTS (Mantis) like to send data between these two systems like that the bug has been closed or the testcase has been set as failed. At the time we used it it wasn't possible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For me, TestLink is a great test management system; I’ve used it in a small busines as a task management tool. The companies where I used to work tended to each have different test management systems…for example, Mailru Group used TestLink for smaller projects like mobile apps and so on. At Moka5 Inc. we used TestLink as well, and I can say that this was one of the most convenient platforms for test management that I know of. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'd like to have great mobile solution for TestLink, also it would be great create integration with Slack, GitHub, Pivotal Tracker etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.