I like that ServiceNow IT Asset Management allows me to use custom fields easily. The IDE feature is particularly useful for development, as it eliminates the need to create a separate development environment. Plus, I can use it on SaaS, which is very convenient. Additionally, ServiceNow makes it easy to create documents. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think it is difficult because our users do not have knowledge. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use ServiceNow IT Asset Management to keep track of the company's devices and software. It helps me see what we have, who might be using it, and where it is. I appreciate that everything is in one place, making it easier to manage licenses. The best part for me is having everything centralized so I don't have to go between multiple spreadsheets, and I like that I can see the entire lifecycle of an asset. Being able to make reports in minutes instead of weeks is nice. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The learning curve I feel like is steep; it seems complex at first until you really learn it. I think the navigation is the biggest thing; there's a lot of nested menus, and it could be a lot better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how ServiceNow IT Asset Management is connected to ITSM, creating more insights for the users submitting tickets. It gives us a central view of what we have and the ability to see more about what assets are available when people submit incidents. We use it to help us inventorize our software and hardware devices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The interface for entering information in ServiceNow IT Asset Management is not very user-friendly. Also, accessing and reporting insights on the information could be easier. We tried to manually assess using ServiceNow IT Asset Management for software because we have disparate lists, and it doesn't really cater much to hardware management. The initial setup was okay, but we didn't have good expertise to help us with it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ServiceNow ITAM is widely regarded as a powerhouse for organizations aiming to bridge the gap between their physical assets and their digital workflows. By leveraging the Common Service Data Model (CSDM), it shifts asset management away from a passive, spreadsheet-driven exercise and makes it an active, integrated part of the IT service lifecycle. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s really nothing to dislike about it; as I mentioned earlier, it’s very easy to handle. ServiceNow ITAM is widely regarded as a powerhouse for organizations looking to bridge the gap between their physical assets and their digital workflows. By leveraging the Common Service Data Model (CSDM), it transforms asset management from a passive spreadsheet exercise into an active part of the IT service lifecycle. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like having a single reliable view of all assets, which is centralized and tied to users, costs, and workflows, eliminating the need to chase data across tools. I also appreciate how ServiceNow IT Asset Management integrates smoothly with other ServiceNow workflows, with assets directly linked to tickets, making operations and troubleshooting much more efficient. The centralized view helps cut a lot of back-and-forth during audits and internal queries by keeping all asset information, including owner, location, cost, and lifecycle, in one place. The integration with IT service management is really useful for tying incidents or requests to specific assets, which makes troubleshooting faster. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's not exactly plug and play. The setup and customization can get heavy and need experienced folks to model everything correctly. So, there is a learning curve to the UI which we feel a bit clunky for simple tasks. UI feels cluttered, common actions take too many clicks and forms show too much by default. The setup process is too complex upfront, a more guided setup, ready-made templates and smarter data import validations would save a lot of time. Not very easy, we had to define the data models, clean and import asset data, and then had to configure the workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the automation abilities of ServiceNow IT Asset Management, which take out a lot of manual asset management work. I appreciate the integration through Service Graph Connectors, as it seamlessly brings all the required data into CMDB and AMDB without the need to check multiple applications. The discovery capabilities are excellent because the data all sits in one inventory and everything is reconciled properly. Additionally, I automate software reclamation, ensuring that software licenses are managed properly, and any over or under utilization can be easily tracked. The seamless integration with ITSM and SecOps processes also adds significant value for me. Overall, we’ve arrived at a much more reliable asset inventory. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are certain applications and device types which are not supported by Discovery, and some cases require high privileges to implement discovery for certain device types. Also, in terms of Hardware asset management, I would like to have barcodes generated, it would be great if ServiceNow had that feature. Finally, I wish there was a way to automate asset ownership, it would make life easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find ServiceNow IT Asset Management impressive for transforming from a passive database into an active participant in business operations. I appreciate its 'Single Source of Truth' feature where Hardware Asset Management and Software Asset Management live on the same platform as the Service Desk, allowing technicians to efficiently manage repairs by seeing warranty status and lease end-dates in the same window. The 'Publisher Packs' for audit defense manage complex licensing for major vendors and are updated in real time, making audits much simpler. Furthermore, its Agentic AI feature proactively manages licenses by reaching out to users about unused software, which can save costs on licenses. The introduction of RaptorDB has significantly improved speed, allowing for real-time inventory management. In short, it automates the boring stuff so IT teams can make strategic financial decisions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While ServiceNow ITAM is a powerhouse, it’s far from perfect. If you’re working with it daily, you’ll eventually run into what I call the 'ServiceNow Tax'—the hidden frustrations that come with such a massive platform. 1. The 'Clean Data' Paradox: ServiceNow ITAM is only as good as your CMDB (Configuration Management Database). The tool marketed as the 'solution' to your messy data actually requires your data to be perfectly clean before it works correctly. If your discovery tools are pulling in duplicate serial numbers or inconsistent naming conventions (e.g., 'Win11' vs 'Windows 11'), the ITAM module will generate inaccurate license positions. Improvement Needed: More built-in, automated 'data scrubbing' or 'fuzzy matching' tools to fix messy records without needing manual intervention from a CMDB manager. 2. High TCO (Total Cost of Ownership): The sticker price is just the beginning. Between the high licensing fees ($100+ per user/month) and the need for expensive 'Certified Implementation Partners,' the cost can be eye-watering. Small teams often find themselves 'buying a Ferrari to drive to the grocery store.' Improvement Needed: A 'Lite' version or more transparent, modular pricing for mid-market companies that don’t need the full enterprise engine. 3. The Customization Trap: ServiceNow is famous for being customizable, but this is a double-edged sword. If you customize your ITAM workflows too much to fit your specific company quirks, you often 'break' the upgrade path. When ServiceNow releases a new version (like the recent 2026 updates), heavily customized instances require weeks of manual testing to ensure nothing breaks. Improvement Needed: A more robust 'low-code' framework that allows for deep customization without diverging from the 'Out-of-the-Box' (OOTB) architecture. 4. User Experience (The 'Cluttered' UI): Despite improvements in the Next Experience UI, the platform remains dense. Navigating through dozens of related lists, forms, and tabs to perform a simple task (like retiring a keyboard or checking a warranty) can feel like a chore. The learning curve for a new asset clerk is steep—it’s not 'intuitive' in the way modern SaaS apps like Slack or Notion are. Improvement Needed: A more streamlined, role-based mobile experience that lets field technicians scan and update assets without seeing 50 fields they don’t need. 5. Integration 'Weight': While it integrates with everything, those integrations are 'heavy.' Setting up an integration with a vendor like Dell or a discovery tool like SCCM often requires complex 'IntegrationHub' spokes and mid-server configurations. It’s rarely as simple as a 'one-click' sync. Improvement Needed: Truly 'plug-and-play' connectors for the top 50 hardware and software vendors that don’t require an architect to set up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The visibility it gives you. Before, nobody really had a clear picture of what assets were out there — now I can pull that up in seconds.

But honestly what I appreciate most is how it ties into everything else. Asset linked to a user, linked to a ticket, linked to a contract. That connected view saves a lot of time and a lot of unnecessary back and forth between teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The learning curve is steep. It's not something you just hand to someone and expect them to figure out on their own.

And the implementation time — it took way longer than we were told it would. That's probably my biggest frustration looking back. Just felt like we were always a step behind where we expected to be.

Cost is up there too. You're committing to a significant investment, and if you're not fully utilizing it, that stings a little. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that ServiceNow IT Asset Management provides real-time feedback and automation for endpoint and SAM tracking, making it a great tool for compliance. It really helped us keep track of software assets, including our agreements, especially when dealing with multiple clients and different software, ensuring compliance across the board was maintained. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The pricing was the biggest reason my previous company switched and they went more towards the Kaseya route. Teaching new users was a learning curve that you had to really go over how some of the automation/reporting worked in detail. It took quite awhile to set up but with a month or two the bare bones structure was set up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

admin point of view. Tasks like asset tracking, lifecycle updates, and license management are much easier to handle now, and it cuts down a lot of manual effort. Once things are configured properly, it runs reliably in the background. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While ServiceNow IT Asset Management is a strong platform overall, there are a few areas that could be improved. From an admin point of view, the initial setup and configuration can be quite complex and time-consuming. Getting everything aligned properly,especially integrations and workflows,often requires deep platform knowledge. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.