SeisEarth Reviews

I like that it fairly new compare to other software like Petrel or DSG. Especially 3D window looks much better than other ones. Also, I liked their supports a lot. Even if it is a newer program, it looks like their supports are pretty knowledgeable about the program.

It is fairly newer than other programs which creates a little problem. It needs more upgrade than other ones. It feels like it is not as comprehensive as Petrel.

I recommend SeisEarth because it looks much newer and cooler than other old Software. Their support is always very helpful, and it looks like they know what they are doing. It always good to get beginning course from few different software, and see which one works best for you. Even if the main idea of all G&G programs are kind of same, they have slight differences in their internal structures. So, try few different ones, and whichever you like it the most, keep getting advance classes and improve your skills.

I was using SeisEarth for 2D-3D seismic correlation and well-correlation.

What I like best: the ability to work in 2D and 3D for interpretation; seismic attribute generation; well-tie tomography; and Stratimagic. Paradigm provides nearly all the tools I need for seismic interpretation. Customer support has also proven valuable.

I do dislike the steep learning curve on almost any application, particularly on things that are not mainstream interpretation items, like well-tie tomography. Support for these is limited.

Make sure you understand the licenses needed to run different applications. We are surprised how some licenses are essential to several application licenses, but these small applications should have been incorporated into the bigger licenses. For instance, ExplorerMV should automatically be part of SeisEarth interpretation.

We are generating geomodels for full field simulations on all of our oil and gas fields. We went with Paradigm to do this most efficiently and thoroughly, and found good success compared to previous software configurations.