SAP Fieldglass Reviews & Product Details

What I like best is how it centralizes our contingent workforce management. It's really helpful for tracking contractors from initial request through invoicing. The SOW management module works well, giving us a clear overview of project-based work. It's pretty solid for keeping everything in one place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest downside is probably the user interface; it can feel a bit dated and kind of clunky to navigate at times. It took a bit to figure out some of the more niche functions. And sometimes the reporting features aren't as intuitive as I'd like. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before Fieldglass, external labor data is usually a "black box" of PDFs and manual invoices. What researchers like best is the centralized data model. It provides a consistent schema for every contractor, gig worker, and SOW (Statement of Work) consultant. For your analysis, this means you don’t have to spend hours normalizing data from five different vendors just to see your total project spend. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For an analyst who wants to get in, pull data, and get out, the UI can feel unnecessarily noisy. It often requires multiple tabs and deep-menu navigation to reach specific data points. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate SAP Fieldglass for allowing me to have all the candidate data and account information in one place, which made my onboarding process smoother. I find it helpful to preview all of the very specific confidential data from one place, especially when changes need to be made to job requisitions. I also found the initial setup of SAP Fieldglass very easy, which was a big plus. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the interface of SAP Fieldglass isn't very user-friendly. I think there could be a bigger use of AI and a redesign with fewer tabs or more organized tabs within each tab. Using less saturated colors would also be helpful for me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

a great platform with a very nice customer interface and the ease of use is exceptional. collaboration is very beneficial with other colleagues and great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The receipt capture and upload experience is another sore spot: images don’t always auto-read correctly, so I end up retyping details that should have been pulled in automatically. When something errors out, the messages are vague, so I’m left guessing what went wrong or which field I supposedly missed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SAP FG is one of the most popular VMS available in the market to manage Contingent Workers, I have been using it to mange contingent workers for different clients.

Its bridge the communication between Vendors/Consultancy and the clients in managing contingent workers.

I use it to track active job status and submitted candidates application status and beyond.

Features are simple to understand and easy to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I do not know of any such flows in SAP FG yet as the brand is very resilient and up to date with anything related to SAP FG features or security that can cause hindrance to my daily usage Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mostly I love the UI for it is user friendly. It is an all-in-one platform that allows us to track external workflow lifecycle from start to finish. It is great because it has a centralized data model that makes our research easy to do. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform is slow, that is the only problem I have encountered but I hope they will fix it and make it fast so that work is smooth and effective to do. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find SAP Fieldglass really beneficial for managing external workforces. The automation features, centralized worker profiles, and real-time analytics are great at providing visibility and ensuring compliance. The automated onboarding and offboarding streamline the processes and improve efficiency. The AI-driven candidate matching and seamless integration with SAP and other systems help immensely with managing contingent labor, SOW projects, and global regulation compliance. These aspects contribute significantly to cost control, risk reduction, and improved efficiency through features like automated invoicing and rate management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the complex UI challenging with too many clicks, making it not very intuitive for casual users. The reporting is quite rigid with limited flexibility for creating custom or blended reports. There are integration challenges, including sync issues and a high effort required to maintain system connections. The workflow inflexibility means that onboarding and offboarding flows can’t easily adapt to exceptions. Also, the supplier insights are limited, and the scorecards and performance analytics seem basic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate how Fieldglass simplifies contractor management by offering centralized workflows, automated approval processes, and robust reporting features that help with compliance and controlling spend. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about SAP Fieldglass is that the interface can feel unintuitive at times. Some tasks take more clicks than expected, and certain workflows feel more rigid than they need to be. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the visibility and extended functionality of SAP Fieldglass very helpful. It works across different countries and markets and provides a clear audit trail. I appreciate that everything linked to a user, like rates, tenure, and approvals, is managed in one place. It's great that it integrates seamlessly with other SAP products that handle our key financial and accounting processes. I also enjoy that tracking information doesn't require digging through emails or dealing with the overhead of manual spreadsheets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the usability a key challenge; sometimes it's slow in certain actions and feels outdated. This adds a bit of a learning curve to adopt and understand to get maximum value. The onboarding process for new users could be improved with better UX and more intuitive first-time use guidance. Role-based dashboards or help could be effective in enhancing the user experience. The initial setup wasn't super easy, there's a lot to configure and not everything is clear from the start, so an expert might be needed to get the most out of it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use SAP Fieldglass to manage vendor contracts, SOWs, and service procurement. This platform assists us in handling global, cross-border external vendor services efficiently. It also streamlines the management of our non-payroll workforce, covering everything from onboarding to offboarding. We utilize this software on a biweekly basis. It is user-friendly, and our integration team was able to implement it smoothly with our main SAP system. The Fieldglass support team has also been cooperative. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main drawbacks of this software are its pricing and complexity. New users or organizations without an IT team may find it challenging to manage on their own. Additionally, the navigation is somewhat unconventional, which can make it harder to get used to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.