Revizto stands out for its intuitive UI/UX, which allows even non-technical stakeholders — such as architects, clients, and site engineers — to navigate models and track issues without any BIM background. This significantly reduces onboarding friction on large, multi-disciplinary projects.

The platform's performance when handling large federated models is a clear differentiator. Working with heavy IFC and NWD files remains fluid, and the 2D-over-3D overlay feature is particularly valuable — being able to reference sheet drawings directly within the 3D environment bridges the gap between design intent and field coordination in a way most platforms still don't offer natively.

The CDE integrations (including ACC/BIM 360) streamline the model publishing workflow, allowing the team to maintain a single source of truth without manual file transfers. This has been especially useful for keeping all project stakeholders aligned on the latest model revisions.

On the wishlist side: pricing remains a barrier for broader adoption — particularly for smaller sub-consultants or projects where a full license per user is hard to justify. Bringing AI-assisted clash detection, automated issue summarization, or smart search set suggestions into the platform would be a natural and powerful next step. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The primary gaps are around data portability and interoperability. A few areas that would significantly improve the workflow:

Export limitations are the most notable pain point. There is currently no native option to export viewpoints into industry-standard formats (e.g., BCF), which creates friction when coordinating with teams using other platforms such as Navisworks or BIM Collaborate. This forces manual workarounds that slow down issue handover between tools.

Measurement tool constraints are also limiting — specifically the inability to take multiple elevation readings in a single session without resetting. On large infrastructure or landscape projects, this adds unnecessary repetition to what should be a quick QA task.

Model export flexibility is another gap. The inability to export the 3D model or extracted geometry into CAD or PDF format restricts how non-Revizto users can consume deliverables. For reporting, client presentations, or contractor-facing documentation, this requires switching to additional tools — breaking the single-platform workflow that Revizto otherwise promotes.

These are not deal-breakers, but addressing them would meaningfully close the gap between Revizto and a fully self-sufficient project coordination platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What we value most at AYA Edificaciones S.A.C. is its ability to centralize communication and interference detection in one place. The integration with complex BIM models is extremely smooth, allowing our Systems and Projects team to collaborate in real-time without any loss of information. The issue tracking is intuitive and has drastically reduced review times both in the office and on-site. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The consumption of hardware resources can be high when handling extremely dense or large-scale models, which requires high-end equipment. We would also like to see improvements in the customization of certain automated incident reports. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a BIM Manager, Revizto has fundamentally changed how our team handles coordination. The federated model environment lets me load and navigate multi-discipline IFC/native models in real time without needing to export or re-sync constantly — this alone saves several hours per week that used to be lost to file preparation before coordination meetings.

The clash detection workflow is where the biggest transformation happened. Previously, resolving clashes meant exporting reports from Navisworks, distributing spreadsheets, and chasing status updates over email — a cycle that could drag a single clash batch out over weeks. With Revizto's Issue Tracker linked directly to clash groups, I can assign a clash to a responsible discipline, set a due date, and track resolution status all within the model view. Clash meetings that used to take two hours now run in under 45 minutes because everyone is looking at the same live model with the same issue statuses.

The Issue Tracker itself has become our single source of truth. Being able to pin an issue to an exact location in 3D, attach photos, comments, and due dates — then have the field team close it from a tablet on-site — removed an entire layer of back-and-forth communication.

Unexpected benefit: I didn't anticipate how useful the 2D/3D linked navigation would be for non-BIM stakeholders. Project owners and consultants who would never open Navisworks are now actively reviewing models and commenting on issues directly, which has noticeably improved decision-making speed on RFIs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most significant limitation I face as a BIM Manager is the absence of bulk clash test creation via a Clash Matrix. On a typical project, we configure upwards of 1,000 clash tests covering all discipline-to-discipline combinations at various levels of detail. Currently, every single test has to be created manually inside Revizto — selecting discipline sets, naming the test, defining the rules — one by one.

The impact of this is substantial. Setting up the full clash matrix for a new project can take the better part of two full working days, and any time the model structure changes or a new discipline is added, a portion of that setup needs to be redone manually again. This is time that should be spent on actual coordination, not configuration.

The fix is straightforward: Revizto should support importing clash tests from a standard Excel-based Clash Matrix — a format that virtually every BIM team already uses to define coordination scope. The spreadsheet would define the test name, the two discipline sets being tested, and any relevant parameters. A one-click import would then generate all tests automatically inside the project.

This is already an established workflow in tools like Navisworks combined with third-party scripts, so the industry expectation is there. Building it natively into Revizto would save BIM Managers hours of repetitive setup per project and significantly lower the barrier to running thorough, well-structured coordination programs — especially on large or fast-moving projects where the clash matrix evolves frequently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the great integration Revizto offers, allowing me to see the design in its entirety across different domains like 3D models, survey data, and technical drawings. The integration is one of my favorites. I also appreciate the simplicity of the interface, which enables a broad range of users to have it ready at hand. I find the ability to toggle between a simple or advanced user interface very useful. It's clear that there's a focus from the developers to keep it readily accessible to many different types of users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel like pricing is a bit of a challenge. Even though it's a golden egg, the competitive pricing with larger software vendors is a limiting factor. There's also an industry bias towards larger software vendors, which impacts Revizto's position. Additionally, while there has been good progress towards infrastructure projects, there are still elements that could be improved for broader application across sectors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The model navigation is superior to everything else on the market in this space. Not just the way you maneuver but also the ease of being able to cut the model or view particular models is fast. Its looks good and works well making users jump into it getting the most from a 3D model coordination tool on a project. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The cost is the biggest concern from my perspective. Revizto does not take on any project risk, it should not clip the ticket based on the project value, it has tangle cost. Fees should be based around real cost being users, data, duration, etc. I particular disliked the move to project licensing given you could previously buy a single license for a user involved in several projects within your company. Now you pay multiple times. Given this our companies adoption of Revizto is low. I had a business case several years ago to adopt it across numerous projects but now based on its fees its significantly higher for similar value to our business. I cannot justify the value so we only look at it for high complexity projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think it is super helpful for keeping as much information in a uniform location as possible. Whether it is the construction drawings, models, or even allowing trades to communicate via the issue tracker. All of these features are extremely helpful when coordinating various construction projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it can be a bit slow, and some updates have caused me to not be able to use the software due to not being able to pull information from past versions of Revizto. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the features I value most in Revizto is the Automated Clash Detection workflow. Instead of manually running clash tests and sorting through results, we can schedule clash runs to occur automatically, and Revizto generates issues and assigns them to the appropriate responsible parties. This has significantly reduced the time our VDC teams spend on coordination activities and ensures that clashes are identified and distributed for resolution as soon as they are detected. The automation improves accountability, speeds up issue resolution, and allows project teams to focus on solving problems rather than managing the coordination process Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest challenge with Revizto is that realizing the full value of its automation features requires upfront planning and workflow standardization. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Revizto is that it centralizes all project coordination on a single platform. The ability to visualize the 3D model along with the 2D plans and generate issues directly on the model elements makes communication between all disciplines much clearer and faster.

In my work coordinating engineering projects, Revizto has significantly reduced the time spent on tracking observations. Each issue is assigned to a responsible person, with priority, status, and history, avoiding the use of long email chains or multiple spreadsheets.

I also highlight its integration with Revit, Navisworks, and other BIM platforms, which allows models to be kept updated without complications. The interface is intuitive and the performance is smooth even with large projects.

Another very valuable aspect is that it facilitates coordination meetings, as all participants can review exactly the same information and navigate to the specific point where there is a conflict. This reduces misunderstandings and speeds up decision-making.

Regarding return on investment, I believe that the time saved in issue management, coordination between specialties, and tracking pending tasks more than justifies its cost. Additionally, the learning curve is relatively short and the support has been adequate when required. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Although Revizto is a very comprehensive tool, I believe there are some aspects that could be improved. In projects with very large BIM models, performance can be affected and synchronization may take longer than expected.

I would also like to have more customization options in reports and dashboards to tailor the information to the needs of each project. Some advanced functions require a greater learning curve and are not always easy to discover for new users.

Finally, the cost of licenses can be high for small companies or teams with many users, so it would be useful to have more flexible licensing options. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Revizto as a full model viewer and for coordination. I love how easy it is to use, and anyone can learn it quickly without much hassle. The fact that both office and field staff can open the model and view it with the same user interface makes it so much easier to use. The cloud hosting feature is great, making it easy to use on the go. I really appreciate that the full model can be run on an iPad or computer, and it works well, rarely having performance issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish there was a way to switch to orthographic viewing rather than perspective. I wish you could mass edit clash tests like you can do with issues. I wish there was a way to make a design vs contractor workspaces in the same project. The cost of Revizto is more than using the Autodesk product. Revizto is relatively easy to set up, but getting it dialed in and finding the correct workflow for your project takes trial and error. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My favorite feature is the AR function in the site app, which is a powerful tool to show the ideal final status while in the early stage of construction Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Revizto can only connect with Documents from Procore instead of from Drawings, so it is time consuming to divide the drawing sets into individual pdf files and upload them to Procore document to link the drawings with the model. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.