Verified User in Consumer Services
UC
Verified User in Consumer Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Save Time with an Efficient AI"
5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I appreciate the ability to find numerous answers with Responsive, formerly RFPIO, and the new AI is a real asset. It allows me to save time and avoid frequently asking my colleagues. The ability to filter information to refine the answers is an advantage. We can also see when the sought answer was last updated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

The sourcing of AI responses sometimes needs to be checked. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User
G
Verified User
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Efficient but Maintenance-Heavy for RFPs"
4/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I like that Responsive is easy to use and helps keep us organized. The search and find functionality is much faster, allowing us to reuse content without having to dig through the drive. I appreciate the tagging and categorization tools that, while requiring some time to manage, are great aspirational features for our team. Also, the initial setup was very easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

It requires a lot of maintenance. It's not a magic organizational bullet, and properly using the tools would require a lot of bandwidth. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sam B.
SB
Sam B.
Global Bid Manager
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Enterprise-Grade Bid Management Made Easy"
4/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

Responsive was an enterprise grade bid management tool, with everything you could need from project management, to content library storage, to AI functionality. The platform was easy to navigate and onboarding was seamless. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

There was perhaps too many tools for our entire company to make use of, and the price point was slightly higher than average. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Rebekah W.
RW
Rebekah W.
Sales Support Administrator
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Intuitive Content Library with Powerful, Helpful AI Features"
4/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

Easy to use content library and AI features Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

Tagging can be time intensive, but once it's complete, it's very helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RB
Rohit B.
Cybersecurity Analyst
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Effortless RFP Responses with Game-Changing AI"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

The best thing about Responsive is that it has made answering RFPs, RFQs so easy and efficient. Additionally, the AI feature which has been recently introduced is a game changer for sure. Overall, it enables us to save a lot of time and help enable the business. We use it very frequently on a daily basis. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

As far as I have used, I haven't faced any issues and it is going very smooth. However, I would like to mention that the price of the tool is a bit high. Apart from this, I dont have any other complaints. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

NP
Neer P.
Senior Customer Success Manager
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Powerful (sometimes overly-powerful) platform that could use a UI update, but solid bang for buck"
3.5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

The various methods to extract information from our content library into the answers - use their AI, their keyword similarity search, assign authors, or upload documents directly. Updating content library is not bad, you can export the Q&A library easily, which is good for maintenance and clean up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

Has too many buttons and sections. Overall their UI needs work as it's quite busy, and most icons can be added to a single toolbar that should be collapsible, not spread across the entire screen. I think they have too many different views for most RFP purposes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User
G
Verified User
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Effortless RFP Management with Responsive"
5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I like how simple Responsive, formerly RFPIO, is to use and the level of detail it provides when answering RFP questionnaires. It saves me a ton of time in crafting responses, allowing me to produce optimal answers almost instantaneously. The accuracy is highly impressive, and it was incredibly easy to set up, taking just a few minutes to get started. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

On certain wordy types of questions, I noticed that the answers might be a little vague. It's very rare that this happens. But there are times where the trace match isn't as ideal as I'd like it to be. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Deepak N.
DN
Deepak N.
Consultant - Solution Design
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Efficient Collaboration and Analytics, but Steep Learning Curve and Search Limitations"
4/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

Responsive stands out for its intuitive interface and seamless collaboration features, which make managing RFPs and proposal content incredibly efficient. The centralized content library and smart search capabilities help us quickly locate and reuse high-quality responses, saving time and ensuring consistency. Its integration with other enterprise tools like CRM systems enhances workflow automation and reduces manual effort. I particularly appreciate the real-time collaboration, which allows cross-functional teams to contribute effectively, improving both speed and accuracy in proposal submissions. The platform’s analytics and reporting tools also provide valuable insights into team performance and win rates, helping us continuously refine our strategy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

While Responsive offers powerful features for proposal management, there are a few areas that could be improved. The learning curve can be steep, especially for new users unfamiliar with the platform’s structure. Some users find the interface unintuitive, making it difficult to locate content or navigate uploaded files efficiently. Additionally, the search functionality can be frustrating when trying to find exact phrases or answers, and the AI-generated responses sometimes lack accuracy or depth, requiring manual corrections. There’s also room for improvement in customization options, such as saved searches and auto-banking of answers, which could enhance usability and flexibility for diverse teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

JM
Jim M.
Senior Manager Information Security and Compliance / CISO
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Outstanding tool for completing security questionnaires"
5/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

They are still one of the best platforms on the market. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I continue to look for ways to implement their software in my current company. They make tracking and maintaining security questionnaire responses more manageable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LP
Linda P.
"Simplified RFP Process with Room for Improvement"
4/5
What do you like best about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

I love the ease of use of Responsive, formerly RFPIO, which helps us save time. We've been able to cut down on RFP completion time from our old processes. It's easy to collaborate on projects across several markets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Responsive, formerly RFPIO?

Moving sections or questions after creation can be wonky if they're in the wrong place. The AI function could be smarter and more savvy to industry trends and knowledge. More format consistency or formatting options would be nice, like a full text ribbon with more fonts, font sizes, alignment options, etc. It would be appreciated if more projects were allowed at once. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.