I have been using Readcube Papers since its first stable release in 2019. But I have actually been using its predecessor Papers since around 2014, so for over ten years. What I can report about my experience is that the software is extremely easy to use and at the same time very sophisticated. I organize all my research with Readcube Papers, manage my PDFs, create shared lists with my master's and doctoral students, and record my notes while reading the texts. The support is extremely attentive and really implements solutions that we demand. I simply could not manage my research today without the powerful help of this tool! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The downside is the high cost, especially for students and researchers from the Global South. Perhaps a specific discount policy for these countries could be applied. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I was a long time user of the old Papers (when it was under Mekentosj). I was a bit nervous about the upgrade and having to pay a subscription, I have been bitten before when a company has purchased an indie dev software I have used. However it was wonderful - works great and better than before and I like the web based access. It does everythign well and I use it every day. iPad apps also work nicely and sync to the cloud. A very good product and well worth the cost. For the record I am a senior Professor at a University with a library of hundreds of papers.

Customer support is also excellent, I've commented on a few issues, some of them have been fixed but all are very positively and quickly replied to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'd like to see improved arXiv integration, i.e. to automatically bring in the metadata based on the arXiv number. It seems that sometimes this does not work and one has to wait a few weeks for a new arXiv posting to sync to whatever databases are used. But for me this is a very minor issue, mostly it is automatic but when it is not fixing it manually could be smoother, Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is easy to look for references, read them, find immediately the related papers, export citations in various formats. It is helpful that you can retreive paper information on the web and automatically update each record. I use it often as my reference manager software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It should work better at find out duplicates and in general housekeeping operations of the database. I have many references, and sometimes it is easy to keep a tidy database. Moreover, the plugin for Safari doesnt work as it should. Last, although the web version has AI integration, the desktop one still fails and in general there are problems with loggin in on the web-based version. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is very easy to import papers and organize them. I especially love the feature where it shows the figures, references and data related to the paper in the side bar. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Things that can be improved on are the library search bar, where if you specify the author's name without selecting author from the drop down menu, it will not show you papers related to the auhtor by the name. You will have to sleect the option and specify author"name" for the search engine to find the paper. Additionally, I would like to see if the figures can be opened in a side window along with the paper to make reading and referring to figures easier. All in all, it is a great reference manager! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the import of new articles into the software, it only takes a drop and everything will be processed and formated. Amazing!

With AI, Readcube has significantlly increase my productivity at work and really strengthen my knowledge during the reading time. The built-in AI helped me overcome "background" hurdles when reading a new paper in a unfamiliar research area and hence, saving me a lot of times. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There was a bug due to different browsers that does not allow the import directly from the website due to the link was not connected. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The database of references and their PDFs is very useful, as is the ability to sync via devices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user interface is inconsistent. Eg. if you press delete a recod, you get a dialogue box with yes highlighted, which elsewhere means this is the default option (as the programmer should expect if that is what the user chose). But no, if you press enter, the record is not deleted. In many of the PDF views selecting text is impossible of very difficult. Thee downloading of PDFs still fails frequently evne when they are clearly indicated on the journal page. Very frequently article data are not matched even though they include the DOI. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

How to organize my references.

How to find references.

The citation process is fairly straightforward.

How the information of reference is automatically acquired by Read Cube is useful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The search engine in Papers, the predecessor to Read Cube, was far superior. With Papers, I could search for a specific word, which would bring all the references (articles) in which this word occurs, anywhere in the text (i.e., not only in the title and/or abstract). This was useful when having forgotten the specific information about a reference (authors, journals), but still remembering specific words that could be found in the text. Read Cube does not allow such a search.

Furthermore, I wish the citation process (how to include references in a Word document) would also function by subject, and not necessarily by using specific information about a specific reference, such as the authors' names. Again, this was a useful feature that could be found in Papers, which reduced the need to remember the names of authors. Only writing a given subject would bring appropriate references.

It's funny how so-called progress is often regressed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Papers is a powerful tool I use regularly from my web browser to catalog and annotate published papers (and other files) easily. The lists (essentially, a virtual directory structure) feature makes it easy to organize papers by subject, project, etc... and they can exist in multiple lists without requiring any duplication of files. The feature set is probably a lot more robust than I make use of, but for managing sources and quickly accessing and building references lists, it's an easy to use solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI design feels inconsistent in terms of everything from where certain menus are to how pop up dialogs are presented. Some simple features the community has asked for are have not been implemented, such as having quick access to a list of recently imported papers (we only have recently read) and also being able to filter by papers that are not currently tagged and/or not currently assigned to any list. These are important features for housekeeping to ensure resources we saved but couldn't catalog right away don't become lost as our libraries grow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

After trying Mendelay, EndNote, and Bookends, none really fitted the way I need to save and create citations. I tried Papers and it finally fitted my workflow.

It has a very good and efficient layout, can automatically pick up most papers' details I either drag in manually or save through the Chrome extension. It also saves webpages, reports, books and lot of other styles. And the one thing other software lacked (either by not having the functionality at all or by the functionality being sub-parr) is being able to organise papers by tags. It also allows you to create folder structures, but I find tags far more efficient.

I use Scrivener to write and, while it doesn't have a direct widget (yet), it's easy to compile a Word doc and then Papers can insert all the correct citations in the right style and also create my bibliography. Such a time saver! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it can't automatically find a reference which is frustrating but not the end of the world. This happens with all the software I've tried.

The Chrome extension could be improved to allow you to add tags or folders when you save. Currently, you save and then go into Papers to organise.

Full integration with Scrivener software would be excellent and I believe from their blog that this is coming soon. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the ability to save PDFs to my library directly from a database, the ability to sort into numerous folders, nested folders, use tags, and create citations in tons of formats easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes when sorting through my entire library, my papers repeat in block sections as I scroll down, so I end up having to resort them multiple times to make sure I can see all of them. Sometimes saving the PDF to ReadCube function isn't available on certain websites (for example, AVMA publications). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.