SM
Soleman M.
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Efficient Design Tool with Room for Improvement"
3/5
What do you like best about RatedPower?

I like that RatedPower can be quite quick to do multiple iterations of the design and provide comparisons in terms of different pitch and different panels. It's able to provide that fairly quickly with little learning curve. I also find it quite efficient in the early stage design, as it helps quickly understand the capacity of the selected land area and how many panels can be fitted. Additionally, the initial setup was fairly easy and quite quick, with the software being easy to learn as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RatedPower?

Areas that require improvement include the ability to have layers and functionality in terms of uploading shape files or KMZ files. It would be helpful to isolate or mark things more clearly instead of relying solely on drawing on the tool. Furthermore, once you get into more detailed design, it lacks features to handle specific requirements like identifying where cables are or locking an inverter to the locations, along with locking in some other features of the land and clearly labeling it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Miguel Marrero of RatedPower

Thank you for taking the time to share such detailed feedback about your experience with RatedPower. We're glad to hear that you find the platform intuitive and efficient for early-stage solar farm design, particularly when it comes to quickly evaluating land capacity, comparing design alternatives, and running multiple iterations with minimal learning curve.

Regarding your comments on site definition and project constraints, RatedPower supports the import of several file formats, including .kml, .kmz, .dwg, and .shp files, to help streamline project setup. You can learn more about this functionality here:

https://help.ratedpower.com/s/article/importing-site?language=en_US

The platform also allows you to define and manage restricted areas, such as exclusion zones around water bodies, buildings, vegetation, and other site constraints. More information is available here:

https://help.ratedpower.com/s/article/upload-different-types-of-restricted-areas?language=en_US

For projects that require greater control during the engineering phase, RatedPower includes Layout Editor, which enables users to manually adjust and position key components, including inverter locations, providing additional flexibility beyond the automated preliminary design process.

We also appreciate your suggestions around cabling visibility, equipment locking, and enhanced labeling capabilities. Feedback like yours plays an important role in shaping our product roadmap, and we've shared these insights with our team for consideration in future developments.

Thank you again for choosing RatedPower and for helping us improve the platform! We look forward to continuing to support your solar project development needs.

JG
Julien G.
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Easy to Use but Improvements Needed for 3D"
3.5/5
What do you like best about RatedPower?

I like that RatedPower adapts well to needs, whether for a preliminary project or a detailed project. The recent additions, such as editable layouts and versioning, make the software really efficient. The fact that it is online is an advantage because it is easily shareable, allowing multiple people to work on the software and even for the less technical, to easily access the design, scheduling, layout, and structure, which are well done. In the prospecting or preliminary project phase, it is really very effective. The software has become very competitive with numerous additions and conferences that facilitate team learning. RatedPower is easy to use and implement in teams. It is fast, easily modifiable, and auditable. The principle of versions with history and validation is great, as is the ability to add notes. The sales teams are super efficient, attentive, and responsive. The webinars and events organized are also great, helping to connect people and going beyond just the software, which is very positive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RatedPower?

There are some drawing tools missing, and sometimes modifying the terrain is a bit difficult. There is also slowness, especially for designs related to topography, and it's often necessary to restart the full simulation on large sites, which complicates things a bit. When I use RatedPower with AutoCAD, I have to download the layout each time, which is somewhat negative. The 3D does not always display very well when exported from AutoCAD, and the ability to export just the 3D of the modules to easily reproject them onto AutoCAD is lacking. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User
G
Verified User
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Quick Simulation and Intuitive Setup"
3/5
What do you like best about RatedPower?

I like the speed in the execution of the simulations, as it allows for many variants to be carried out in a short time, achieving more optimal solutions. I also appreciate the ease of loading hourly generation profiles that enable the loading of already constructed and producing plants, or simulations of third-party programs without having to complete the design of the installation with which the BESS would be hybridized. Additionally, I found that the initial setup was very easy and RatedPower is intuitive, especially because the RatedPower team provided us with training. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RatedPower?

Generation profiles should be quarter-hourly to adapt to the reality of the current market. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CP
Clémence P.
Doctorante CIFRE
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Quick and Responsive, But Improvements Possible"
4.5/5
What do you like best about RatedPower?

I love using RatedPower for the speed of designing PV and BESS plants, which is really efficient. The customer support is very responsive, which is appreciated, and the regular updates ensure the software runs smoothly. The use is easy, making the experience more enjoyable. The ability to manually edit the PV tables is a major advantage, as it allows for adaptation to site constraints and optimization of the plant layout. Moreover, the initial installation was very simple. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RatedPower?

It would be interesting to also be able to adjust the battery and PC containers for BESS projects. This would allow for optimizing the small available spaces, for example. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Construction
UC
Verified User in Construction
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Excellent Design and CAD Layout Generation That Saves Time"
4.5/5
What do you like best about RatedPower?

It offers excellent design capabilities and can generate CAD layouts directly, which saves a significant amount of time. It also includes an extensive database of inverter and solar panel models, making the software easy to use and highly user-friendly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RatedPower?

It’s just that when we edit the layout and later need to change the panels, it resets the layout, and then we have to redo all the changes again. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mehdi L.
ML
Mehdi L.
Senior Financial Analyst
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Empowers Non-Engineers, Needs Smoother Performance"
4.5/5
What do you like best about RatedPower?

I use RatedPower for creating PV and BESS site layouts. I appreciate that it allows someone, even without CAD or technical engineering experience, to create accurate site layouts and understand the impact of constraints. It's very quick to see the impact of site design changes. Without needing to pull in an engineer, I can understand how changes to constraints, landowners, or other site decisions impact my eventual production and MW size. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RatedPower?

Sometimes, RatedPower can be a little buggy or finnicky, but usually, a refresh or a reload does the trick. I also think having better team features, like setting a design as 'active' or having version history of designs rather than all designs being separate, could be good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Benjamin F.
BF
Benjamin F.
Co-Founder and Managing Director
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Great product!"
5/5
What do you like best about RatedPower?

Speed of generating design + all documentation is unparalleled Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RatedPower?

Lack of customisation regarding array (and roads) placement. Particularly relevant for smaller projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Emilio García Sánchez of RatedPower

Benjamin, thanks a lot for taking the time to review our software.

We work toward enabling our users design and engineer the PV plant a-to-z within pvDesign.

Find attached below a link to our Product Updates, live quarterly sessions where our product and engineering folks debrief our latest features. Hope this helps!

Thanks a lot!

See how RatedPower improved
KA
Kristian Bie A.
Grid Integration Engineer
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Quickly Quantify Areas into Power Plants"
5/5
What do you like best about RatedPower?

How quickly you can quantify specific areas into actual power plants. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RatedPower?

In regards to the new BESS-features, I am still lacking the possibility of making a representative financial model of the arbitrage case, as it is not possible to count in tariffs at the moment. Likewise, I am also using the BESS-features for making early design layouts, in which the flexibillity could be improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Oil & Energy
AO
Verified User in Oil & Energy
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Javier Laitano CMI"
5/5
What do you like best about RatedPower?

I really like the user interface; it's really easy to start a new project. Additionally, I find it extremely beneficial that, when making modifications, they are saved separately.

Customer service is another high point: they are always willing to help or solve any problem.

The implementation of projects is super simple; truly, one can have a project ready in a matter of hours. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RatedPower?

The project settings are quite limited and do not allow for real customization. Additionally, the integration with other tools, such as PVSyst, does not work very well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jake S.
JS
Jake S.
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Fast and Cost-Effective Solar Design Tool"
4/5
What do you like best about RatedPower?

I like the speed of RatedPower as it speeds the whole process and lets me look at many iterations quickly. I also appreciate the documentation it provides and currently, the support is really good. The ease of making early stage conceptual designs quicker and cheaper than using traditional tools is a big plus. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about RatedPower?

I would like the ability to set scenarios I want to look at in advance in a logical manner, maybe from a spreadsheet-type form. Selecting different variables. Right now, it's kind of on the fly. And I find it inefficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Miguel Marrero of RatedPower

Hi Jake,

Thank you for your positive feedback! We're thrilled that RatedPower is helping you with early-stage conceptual designs and providing good support.

Regarding your suggestion for setting scenarios in advance, I recommend taking a look at our feature to use input templates (https://help.ratedpower.com/s/article/how-to-create-input-templates?language=en_US). This allows users to save designs as templates so that you can quickly use them to replicate your usual inputs in new projects and simulations.

We understand your suggestion goes beyond this, so we will take it into consideration for future improvements to the software.