I am a creative lead, and I must approve everything that goes out to our clients. Before we got Quick Reviewer, this meant that every morning I would have a dozen (or two/three dozen) emails that I would go through, understand, put together the various docs, and screenshots in a folder, and give comments per email per the screenshot, then share them back to the team. In short - it was a terrible way to do things. With Quick Reviewer, reviewing various types of media assets is an enjoyable process. I am now done with my review in less than an hour and move on to more creative things. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are no problems with using Quick Reviewer. It would be good to have some automated workflows that we can set Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I manage a creative team. A lot of files are sent to me for review, so I need to quickly manage and view all the proofs, identify the status of each file and follow up on files that have not been acted on. QuickReviewer gives me a clear view of each of these aspects which makes life way easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Comment responses should be sent to reviewers without having to @ mention them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the flexibility and options to create workspaces and share them with my team. The workspace option is nice because not everyone wants to give access to everything all of the time. I particularly love that it supports Adobe files and connects with PS and InD Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Setting a deadline for a proof isn’t intuitive. You have to right click on a file to choose that option, and it doesn’t give you the option to set reminders. As a feature request, I would like to send automated reminders before the deadlines. It would also be better if you move or add the deadline option to the share file window. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Multiple people can provide inputs on huge, multi-paged designs with QuickReviewer. Its markup tools are unique, and when used appropriately, they can be very helpful to the designer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

By copying the public link and pasting it into our project management software, we can share our QuickReviewer proofs. There is no out-of-the-box integration with JIRA and Trello although they say it’s coming soon. Recommendations to others considering the product:

A straightforward, easy-to-use interface that will help you immensely, if you have a large creative team, and are getting bogged down with proofing and reviews, and mistakes are sliding through the gaps. Gone are the days when reviews and feedback were lost in an email chain. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What we like best about QuickReviewer is how simple it is to share videos and proofs with anyone, and they can add comments and recommendations on the timeline. We get emails when someone comments or approves the work; this is a huge time saver because we used to send like 20 emails back and forth to get the job done. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don’t have any dislikes about QuickReviewer because it does what we require. I do have some feature recommendations that would take the product to the next level. Workflow and range based video comments would be two of them. We’ve shared them with the support team, and hope to see these features come out soon. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the accuracy of the commenting options available. Plus the option to compare and each proof, that helps clients to see all the visual modifications made to the file Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Would like to have an auto-compare option. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the Dropbox integration feature. I do not have to upload files to QuickReviewer anymore. I see the comments in QuickReview, then make the changes to the source file and boom! Everything is done in seconds. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are some file formats that QuickReview doesn’t seem to support in Dropbox. Apparently these are files that browsers don't natively support. Those need to be uploaded into QuickReview and cant directly be linked to Dropbox.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Try it. Once you go Quick, I’m sure it will Stick. (I tried ;-)) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that I can amend my comments in QuickReviewer, and I also think it's fantastic that I can use them as a checklist, because it makes it easier for me to quickly browse through and locate what is completed and what is left. It's also quite useful to have the ability to favourite or like comments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I believe auto-compare would be a terrific addition, so you can see the difference between two versions. Another one would be the option to compare two different files (not just revisions). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This software has helped me streamline the process of review and approval and helped make the most of the time I have and which I now use in improving the efficiency and quality of my services rather than chasing a long list of emails. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing to anything for dislike. It's good.. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Do you remember missing comment number 20 on frame number 31? We don't… or at least not anymore. With QuickReviewer, our comments are organized neatly by asset and version, making it trivial for our team to consolidate feedback in real-time. This has helped us get higher levels of customer satisfaction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We miss not having the capability to use Word and PPT in QuickReviewer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.