I use Qualio for keeping track of NCRs and deviations, and I appreciate how it keeps us notified if we have any open issues. I like how accessible Qualio is, as it makes everything simple and easy to navigate. There's no file I can't find, and it keeps them clearly labeled as open or closed. Setting up Qualio was very easy for my team, which has around 200+ people. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It could be a little better looking visually, it's kind of bland. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Very wasy to use, no unneccesary complexity that I've seen with other quality systems Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The search bar up the top, when I search document name it usually gives something else as first suggestion Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Traceability is highly valued by Qualio Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not including spreadsheet features is a major weakness. The limitation of word processing features is a barrier for users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to follow and understand, and able to provide quizzes/assessments at the end of each module. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Wish it could be a bit more interactive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

iCAR management. It is much easier to manage than our previous system Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Migrating our documents to qualio. we are still working on that. Having the number of full users is rather expensive Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like qualio because it is increadibly easy to learn and to navigate. Creation of document and mainteinance of document records is facilitated, avoiding the burdens usually associated with non-e qms. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes there are bugs! But they are easily resolved. Also, I don't like the fact that cerain views are not customisable (I cannot choose all the filter tools I could) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- very intuitive UI

- covers many basic process needed in a good draft/review/approval/training to build a QMS

- allows people management accross the whole QMS and team work/collaboration to build it Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- revision history could be visible in the interface (not just on the uploaded documents)

- same for reviewer/approver (you have to open the doc to see)

- managers can't see their team's work (I believe this is only allowed at an admin level; each manager could have their team's overall progress, it would help) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how Qualio keeps all of our documents in order. It's easy to upload documents, which makes managing them straightforward. I find having everything located in one place very helpful for gathering documents when I need them for credentialing. The initial setup was pretty simple, and that made starting with Qualio easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it could be more user-friendly on the phone. It's difficult to retrieve documents or upload them on the phone, and it doesn't show up correctly on the screen. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Keep it simple, stupid! The search mode is perfect. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the Lay out isn't very sexy if you ask me... Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1-It is easy to set up templates and reuse those templates for multiple purposes.

2- The price is good compared to other vendors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1-Filtering and locating documents by document number and/or name is not intuitive.

2-Connecting and updating document links can be challenging (for example, modifying connections between sections such as Risk Control Measures (RCMs) and MRS/SRS (Requirement Specifications) is not intuitive and the titles will not update correctly)

3- In addition, response times for resolving reported issues with these features are often lengthy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.