--- title: QF-Test Reviews meta_title: 'QF-Test Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how QF-Test works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.6 review_count: 9 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-05-21' parent_category: name: DevOps url: https://www.g2.com/categories/devops --- # QF-Test Reviews **Vendor:** Quality First Software **Category:** [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools) **Average Rating:** 4.6/5.0 **Total Reviews:** 9 ## About QF-Test QF-Test is the established tool for professional GUI test automation of desktop, web & mobile applications as well as PDF documents. QF-Test is a low-code GUI test tool that allows you to efficiently create test cases, e.g. using Capture/Replay, without any programming knowledge across platforms on Windows, Linux and macOS. For software developers, Jython, Groovy or JavaScript offer advanced scripting possibilities. Tests can be run automatically via continuous integration tools such as Jenkins and generate detailed log files and XML or HTML reports. Use QF-Test to create robust and stable regression tests for various GUI technologies. QF-Test supports all types of Java GUIs, ranging from Swing (including ULC, JIDE components, CaptainCasa), its successor JavaFX, as well as the Standard Widget Toolkit (SWT) and Eclipse, including plugins and RCP applications. You can also use QF-Test to test dynamic web applications based on Angular, React or Vue.js, for example, including Electron and hybrid applications using JxBrowser, JPro or WebSwing, for example. QF-Test supports native Windows desktop applications created with Win32, .Net, Windows Forms, WPF, Windows Apps. Mobile applications can be tested on real devices or with the Android Studio Emulator or iOS Simulator and Xcode. In addition, you can test automated whether your web application complies with common accessibility standards in just a few simple steps. PDF documents can also be conveniently tested automatically with QF-Test. On the market since 2001, the test tool is continuously being actively developed and is currently used by more than 1,500 companies across 60 countries. Contact us by e-mail at service@qftest.com or get a free trial version at www.qftest.com/en! ## QF-Test Reviews ### 1. Lacks Mobile App Support **Rating:** 3.5/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Destacamento A. | Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** March 25, 2024 **What do you like best about QF-Test?** With QF-Test it is possible to build a framework for the automation of GUI testing for desktop applications. The visual editor, with which non-coders can create test scripts without expertise, moves the bar of test case creation. It helps catching regressions and thus makes sure that user experience is smooth. **What do you dislike about QF-Test?** Mobile Apps Testing is not supported by QF Testing by default. The limitation of this is the fact that we are carrying our world with us at all times. Our approach needs to be based on third party tools or hacks. What this means is that we have to spend extra time overcoming inefficiency and complex issues. **What problems is QF-Test solving and how is that benefiting you?** The QF-Test rule has minimized the pain of GUI testing for desktop applications. It is possible for me to develop computerized tests automatically now while I devote time to analyze more comprehensive methods of testing. This not only ensures the app's stability but also minimizes unknown bugs that occasionally slip through during the testing process. ### 2. QFT compact training **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Verified User in Semiconductors | Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 20, 2021 **What do you like best about QF-Test?** The best is to implemet GUI tests very easily in first step. **What do you dislike about QF-Test?** Some of error messages are not clear and are coufusing and I can't fine real root cause of the errors. **What problems is QF-Test solving and how is that benefiting you?** GUI interactive performance issues. Our purpose is to detect issues before our customers find them. - [View QF-Test pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/qf-test/reviews?filters%5Bnps_score%5D%5B%5D=4§ion=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-08-13+08%3A07%3A45+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=eeda908d-5fa3-4bbe-9e9e-811a45ffaabe&secure%5Btoken%5D=dadd7c052b527f02dbe313a922d9d03bcaff82016e6bb20c9a3a488a65d70d96&format=llm_user) ## QF-Test Features **Functionality ** - Test Feedback - Test History - Customization - Test Variety **Automation** - Organization - Reliability - Thoroughness **Agentic AI - Automation Testing** - Autonomous Task Execution - Natural Language Interaction - Proactive Assistance - Supports Parallel Execution **Additional Functionality** - Assessment Management - Reporting & Statistics - Security Testing - Parameterized Testing - Data Visualization - Data Import/Export - AI Copilot - API - Unicode Compliance - Monitoring - Performance Management - Real-Time Reporting - Issue Tracking - Performance Testing - Bug Tracking - Compliance Management - Move & Copy - Requirements Management - Hierarchical View - User Management - Software Testing Management - Model-Based Testing - Activity Dashboard - Issue Management - Quality Assurance - Version Control - Activity Tracking - Data Extraction - Static Analysis - Requirements-Based Testing - Real-Time Monitoring - Customizable Reports - A/B Testing - Alerts/Notifications - Action-Word Testing - Test Script Reviews - Data Storage Management - Workflow Management - Generative AI - Collaboration Tools - Drag & Drop ## Top QF-Test Alternatives - [UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/uipath-agentic-automation/reviews) - 4.6/5.0 (6,136 reviews) - [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) - 4.4/5.0 (3,318 reviews) - [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/products/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence/reviews) - 4.5/5.0 (534 reviews)