I’m really enjoying using Qase so far. We used a different test management tool before, and I like Qase much more. The UI is intuitive, simple, and visually appealing. Features like Test Plans, Test Cases, Repositories, and Shared Steps make it easy to keep all my tests organized. Project settings are highly customizable, which is a big plus. Integrating Qase with our CI/CD was straightforward and worked almost immediately after we were granted access. I use it almost daily to monitor the health of my test suites, and it’s made the whole process much simpler. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don’t have any major dislikes about Qase. The UI is visually appealing, though some areas could benefit from a more modern update. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a QA professional responsible for managing regression test cases, I’ve been using Qase regularly and have found it to be a small but efficient tool for test case management. It’s easy to navigate, fast to set up, and generally gets the job done without unnecessary complexity.

One of Qase’s strongest points is its excellent customer service. Any time I’ve run into issues or needed help, their support team has been responsive and helpful in troubleshooting.

Another positive aspect is that Qase is evolving quickly, with frequent updates and feature rollouts. That said, one downside is that the new “QaseNew” interface or format still feels incomplete—it isn’t quite ready for full use, and some features seem to be in transition. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’m hopeful future updates will bring more stability and better usability, especially if Qase can eventually integrate large language models (LLMs) to offer more intelligent test management and automation support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy and intuitive to execute the test cases, formalize it as routine and functionality documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the intuitive interface of Qase, but I miss more comprehensive and customizable reports. This would greatly help in the analysis of test results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qase is very intuitive and easy to use. The support team is excellent — every time we have a question, they provide quick, personalized, and helpful assistance! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish the integration with Jira for test cases were more straightforward, and that test cases were displayed more visibly within Jira tasks Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's speed and it's customisation options. Also it's integration options making it simple to incorporate into current flows. It's responsive and fast overall when loading big test repositories. Customer Support being available via the bubble in the top is a big game changer compared to other platforms. Reports are generated in seconds/minutes unlike others like TestRail which were taking hours Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Compared to TestRail and TestLink, Qase is much more realiable making it difficult to comment on this. Some features are in the works to be implemented such as more customisation options to the Dashbaord so currently that's one thing to dislike but it's being improved upon Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how managing test cases in Qase is easy for us. It's also a lot easier to schedule planning and run tests, which helps our team immensely. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the automation features in Qase could be improved. It would be great if it could run more effective automated test cases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the conditional test cases in Qase (test case parameters). The ability to put conditions in test cases makes it easy when we need to run similar scenarios with different conditions. This feature allows us to create just one test case instead of a set of similar cases, which is helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes I need more statistics dashboards. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We’ve been using QASE as our test management tool and are extremely happy with it. The platform is simple, intuitive, and easy to use, making it ideal for both QA engineers and other team members involved in the testing process. Its clean and well-structured interface allows us to organize, run, and track tests efficiently without unnecessary complexity.

QASE provides all the features we need for effective test management, including test case organization, integrations, reporting, and collaboration tools. Everything works smoothly and reliably.

One of the standout aspects is their excellent support team. They are not only responsive and quick to help, but also provide an outstanding level of technical expertise and customer care. Every interaction we’ve had with them has been efficient and helpful.

Overall, QASE has been a valuable addition to our QA process, and we highly recommend it to any team looking for a reliable, user-friendly test management solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only downside we've experienced with QASE is related to Test Runs.

If a test case is updated after a Test Run has already created, the changes are not reflected within that active Test Run. This can sometimes lead to confusion or outdated steps being executed, especially in fast-paced testing cycles. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

QASE strikes a great balance between usability, modern design, and essential test management features. The UI is clean and easy to navigate — even non-QA stakeholders like developers or product managers can browse test cases or test runs without needing guidance.

We especially appreciate:

The ability to link manual and automated test results.

Flexible test plans with multiple configurations and milestones.

Useful integrations with CI/CD pipelines and tools like Playwright.

The REST API is well-documented, making it easy to plug into our automation workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While QASE handles most of our needs excellently, it falls short in parameterized or data-driven test cases. There's no native way to manage "Scenario Outline"-style datasets or re-run the same test case with multiple data variations.

We’d also love:

More customization options in test step fields (e.g., a third column for data).

Better exploratory testing support.

Slight improvements in reporting (especially for filtering and grouping automated vs. manual results in mixed runs). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like how Qase supports faster sprints by executing well-organized test runs. The initial setup was smooth, which made getting started easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think Qase could improve on the stronger requirement management linkage inside the platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.