Qase Reviews & Product Details

Qase has a strong and well-thought-out core for test management. Test case structure is flexible and clear, making it easy to work with both manual and automated tests. Integrations with automation tools and CI pipelines are practical and save time in real QA workflows. Overall, the platform feels reliable for day-to-day test management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main downside is the current behavior of the AI assistant (Aiden). Deleting a step always removes the pause automatically, and the AI often regenerates previously deleted steps, ignoring manual changes. There is no way to lock steps, preserve deletions, or manage steps in bulk, which makes iterative refinement unpredictable and frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Qase is how clean and intuitive it feels, you don't have to fight the interface to get work done.

I also appreciate how easy it is to organize test cases without things getting messy.

The collaboration features are smooth, it actually feels built for real teams.

Its integration save a lot of manual efforts, which is always a win.

And honestly, it just feels modern compared to many older test management tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't have any dislike about Qase as I really like this tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like the simplicity and straightforward features of Qase, which make it easy to use for day-to-day testing without having to spend too much time figuring things out. This helps me concentrate more on the actual testing work. The Aiden AI for generating test cases is also growing on me, especially as it creates test cases that already follow my format, saving both time and effort. Qase is great for automation testing too; I'm amazed at how it automatically creates test runs, making the process smoother and more efficient, particularly for repeated tests. Overall, it makes both manual and automation testing more manageable. The initial setup of Qase was easy and the tool is very user-friendly, which really supports my workflow and grows with use over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes Qase can feel a bit laggy, especially when navigating between pages or loading test cases. There are moments when actions take longer than expected, which can slow down the testing flow, particularly during busy testing sessions. Improving the performance and responsiveness would make the overall experience smoother and help maintain focus while working. In terms of performance, Qase can sometimes feel slow when loading test cases, switching between sections, or working with larger test suites. This becomes more noticeable when multiple testers are using the project at the same time. Improving page load times, reducing delays when clicking actions, and making the UI more responsive would really help improve the overall experience. It would also be great if background processes, like syncing or saving changes, were faster or less noticeable so they don't interrupt the workflow. Overall, better performance optimization would make Qase feel smoother and more efficient during daily testing activities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Qase for managing both manual and automated test cases for our SaaS product development. The biggest feature for us is the integration with Asana and Playwright, which makes a lot of our interactions seamless and automated. Playwright helps us run UI tests, and Qase allows us to track and manage these tests. I also found it really easy to set up Qase thanks to the setup flow and tutorials. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish Qase would write to Asana so that we can get linked back to Qase from the Asana ticket. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- It is a very user friendly test management system

- Continuous development and enhancement of the software

- Easy, clear management of different project repositories

- New feature (AIDEN) is a great tool to help with generating test cases and, more specifically, help in suggesting corner/edge cases we may not have thought off Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- There is nothing to add here with regard to negative points Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the convenience offered by Qase, as the entire usability of the platform is simple and greatly facilitates our work in including test cases. Everything is intuitive, with clear descriptions and pre-configured options for the fields, such as the selection between manual or automated tests and the specification of unstable tests, which greatly simplifies our daily routine. The structure for including test cases is very well organized, allowing us to keep all documentation centralized and well-managed, a crucial aspect for any QA team. Moreover, the transition to using Qase was quite smooth and uncomplicated, contributing to a good adaptation for the entire team. This combination of simplicity, functionality, and ease of use is what makes Qase a truly valuable software for our work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the Qase dashboard needs improvements. The information displayed on it is not clear or is often incomplete. This forces me to use queries to view certain information that should be more accessible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The interaction of cypress to directly create tests within the platform so you dont have to write tests that you already have present. Also the ability to link cypress tests to tests already written. We are using the platform as a test library to determine the Automation coverage of our platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Did have some issues with getting cypress up and running even using the likes of both Grok and ChatGPT for assistance, the support team were able to resolve my problems due to a configuration I was missing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I find most helpful about qase is the ability to create test cases using AI, along with the responsive, active chat support whenever I have questions or inquiries. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about Qase is that when I integrated Newman with Qase, it didn’t reflect the test results for the test cases that passed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most helpful feature of Qase is its defect integration with Azure DevOps and other bug management tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In my experience, the main downside of using Qase is exporting test cases to a CSV file, because the formatting can be a bit confusing and not as straightforward as I’d expect. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As we are using qase for managing out test cases and it make our process much easier as compare to different tools which makes our work little messy.

It is very easy to use. The layout is simple and clean. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

With Qase our work get so smoother so there is nothing to dislike qase Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.