Verified User in Computer Software
UC
Verified User in Computer Software
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Moved on from ALM Complete"
2/5
What do you like best about QAComplete?

what we did like was that the ALM solution was 'all in one'. Defects, stories\requirements, customer portal, project management in one place, with the capability to link Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QAComplete?

Performance was horrible, and there were numerous issues\defects that we had to contend with. We worked with the SmartBear team for a considerable period to address our issues but were unsuccessful. In fact, the "pain" was so great that we simply abandoned the app and all of our requirements, test cases (thousands), defect details, taking CSV exports and moving over to Axosoft. While not perfect, Axosoft gives much improved perfomance and is a simpler interface to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
UH
Verified User in Hospital & Health Care
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Useful for test cases and defects"
4/5
What do you like best about QAComplete?

I can pull reports and data for metrics for different projects and time periods Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QAComplete?

There are too many security levels and people assigned to them in our organization. One should be able to review any project Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Construction
GC
Verified User in Construction
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Quite a decent product to manage all your project requirements"
5/5
What do you like best about QAComplete?

Managing the complete test cycle has become such an ease with this tool. I have been involved in all the steps of a testing life cycle as part of my job and every step this tool has been handy. The major advantage being easy integration with other tools and utilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QAComplete?

Searching for an already existing object repository related to your project and maintenance becomes a tideous job sometimes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Antonio H.
AH
Antonio H.
Team Lead/QA Automation Specialist
Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"A great way to manage all of your project needs."
4/5
What do you like best about QAComplete?

QAComplete has the potential to manage project requirements, releases, and reporting. With the right setup any portion of information in your project may be linked to all other relative information. This can mean tickets linking to requirements, or test executions linked to releases or other tickets. QAComplete can become a center-point of information for all members of the project, not just testers but also developers, and project managers. The amount of information and the many ways you may analyse it makes this software a huge asset; as well as its ability to conform to many different development processes, agile, waterfall, etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QAComplete?

Mid range knowledge ramp up, and painstaking setup for projects already in progress. some buggy functionality in some areas of the app. Response time on the help forums for Smart Bear can be slow and sometimes unhelpful to resolving an issue. It is possible for other users to mess up information in QAComplete Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Telecommunications
AT
Verified User in Telecommunications
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"A complete Test Management tool"
3.5/5
What do you like best about QAComplete?

This tool is highly customizable to suit your company requirements . It contains all the required modules that one should have in a company to manage the testing life cycle from requirements to test reports.

It could easily integrate with other bug reporting tools like JIRA or Bugzilla. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QAComplete?

Many a times I wanted to filter the test cases based on number of steps written per test.

i.e. 0 steps or less than 4 or 5 steps etc. This is very important initially when test library is under preparation and all of the test cases are either New or In design status.

But I could not figure out a way to get this type of report or filter .

It would be very beneficial to have such filter option. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.