QA.Tech Reviews (15)

Reviews

QA.Tech Reviews (15)

4.9
15 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Users consistently praise the product for its ease of use and seamless integration with existing workflows, allowing teams to automate testing without heavy technical expertise. The intuitive interface and responsive support enhance the overall experience, making it a valuable tool for improving testing efficiency. However, some users note that the AI can occasionally suggest irrelevant tests, requiring minor adjustments.

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Here's how.
NW
Noam W.
QA Lead
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
More Options
"AI-Powered testing that actually understands your app"
5/5
What do you like best about QA.Tech?

From seamless integration to intelligent test coverage, every aspect of the platform feels like it was built by people who truly understand the challenges of modern software testing.

User-friendly UI and the chat bot can give you any answers that you are looking for, but also a support that replying fast. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QA.Tech?

Things get developed and implemented fast, meaning you, as a customer wanting more and more Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jonathan R.
JR
Jonathan R.
CEO / Founder
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
More Options
"Finally a way to automate testing to focus on what matters"
5/5
What do you like best about QA.Tech?

We are running a saas where uptime is critical - so to us, testing is core. As a fast growing startup we finally found a easy way to automate our testing. And to do it in a scalable way vs previous more manual setup in cypress. QA tech helps us focus on the business, and shipping features - not maintaining tests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QA.Tech?

Quite a new user - so have found any downsides yet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lucas M.
LM
Lucas M.
Design lead
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
More Options
"An excellent addition to a testing pipeline, simplifying QA and helping us identify errors earlier."
4.5/5
What do you like best about QA.Tech?

* End-to-end testing without the hefty time investment

* Middle path between human QA and static e2e tests like playwright

* Low threshold to get started, easy to implement

* Excellent customer service

* Simple integration with CI pipeline Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QA.Tech?

* Some times auto-generated tests need manual tweaking

* High initial cost makes it less viable for some clients Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Daniel Mauno Pettersson of QA.Tech
Editedit

Thank you, Lucas, for taking the time to review us! That means a lot!

Regarding the high initial cost, we have reworked our pricing model since you joined to fit clients of all sizes better!

Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
UM
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
More Options
"QA Tech - the future is here!"
4.5/5
What do you like best about QA.Tech?

I like that it's intuitive to use. Capable product. Makes it easy to review and measure functionality in our product. Can't think of much else one would want for quality assurance for any web based application. Easy to implement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QA.Tech?

Minor AI hallucinations at times, and visual UI bugs are not as easy to pick up on. Some suggested tests are not always needed, but likely a case by case kind of thing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Rasmus F.
RF
Rasmus F.
GTM lead
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
More Options
"A new way to test web apps!"
5/5
What do you like best about QA.Tech?

It's fully automated. All I had to do was give their agents access to my staging environment and then it handled the rest Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QA.Tech?

Some more complex tests took slightly longer (a few minutes) the first time I ran them - but it seems to be going down Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.