I like being able to generate layouts quickly and compare electrical equipment efficiently with PVFARM. The ability to review site constraints, evaluate different racking options, and generate earthwork quantities is really valuable for tailoring the design to meet customer needs and price targets. Plus, I appreciate that it's cloud-based, which was a big factor for choosing it over PVcase for higher level design. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I find generating and adjusting road layouts a bit challenging. It can also be tricky to bring in existing layouts from CAD into PVFARM. I wish there was a feature that could read hydrology reports and surfaces to predict where basins might be needed. Also, the initial setup of PVFARM was fairly difficult. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Hi Olivia, thanks for the thoughtful review and the 3.5 stars.
Glad to hear PVFARM is helping you move quickly on layouts, equipment comparisons, racking evaluations, and earthwork. That’s the core of what we’re building: fast iteration without sacrificing engineering depth. And yes, being fully cloud-based (especially compared to desktop tools) is a big part of that.
On the friction points:
- Road layouts: Fair call. We’re actively improving the workflow to make iteration smoother and more intuitive.
- CAD imports: Legacy geometry can get messy fast. We’re continuing to improve how layouts translate into PVFARM so less time is spent cleaning and more time designing.
- Hydrology + basin prediction: You’re thinking the same direction we are. As grading intelligence expands, drainage logic is absolutely part of that roadmap.
- Initial setup: Bringing layout, civil, and electrical into one workspace adds depth, and we’re investing heavily in making onboarding faster and more guided.
Appreciate you taking the time to lay it out clearly. Feedback like this directly shapes what we improve next.



