--- title: PureBasic Reviews meta_title: 'PureBasic Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 10 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how PureBasic works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.6 review_count: 10 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-08-02' parent_category: name: Editor url: https://www.g2.com/categories/editor --- # PureBasic Reviews **Vendor:** Fantaisiea Software **Category:** [Text Editor Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/text-editor) **Average Rating:** 4.6/5.0 **Total Reviews:** 10 ## About PureBasic PureBasic is a native 32-bit and 64-bit programming language based on established BASIC rules. ## PureBasic Reviews ### 1. Cross-platform, efficient, readable, versatil **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Luciana C. | Analista contable, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** November 17, 2023 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** Cross-platform support, efficient native compilation, readable syntax, comprehensive commands, dedicated community, suitable for beginners and experienced programmers. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** Smaller community compared to mainstream languages, fewer built-in libraries, less third-party support, not as well-known as some alternatives, limited advanced language features compared to some languages. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** PureBasic addresses cross-platform development, efficiency, readability, versatility, and GUI design, offering a dedicated community for support. ### 2. An excellent word processor for beginners and experts **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Sergio C. | Programador De Software Junior, Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** August 10, 2019 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** PureBasic has a basic interface with several features to integrate. I like that you have a lot of commands to easily code any program or application. What I find most interesting is that it does not require external DLLs to create executables in the environment. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** There are not many features that I dislike about this software, except sometimes that the text autocomplete function suggests words that do not match the type of variable or type of data being edited. **Recommendations to others considering PureBasic:** This editor is a great word processor that needs very few computer requirements and can run on different operating systems. In addition, it has full Unicode support and several commands to facilitate coding. I recommend it. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** PureBasic has benefited us thanks to its file accessibility, since it handles different programming languages ​​and its portability, because it is currently installed on almost all computers in the IT office on different operating systems. In addition, its friendly interface has allowed us employees who just enter the company to adapt easily to develop with this software. ### 3. First class programming language to work with programming codes **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Andry A. | Programador III, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** April 20, 2019 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** It is a programming language that is easy to learn for anyone starting in programming. It is organized and has a large library, allowing you to create programs ranging from simple to the most powerful. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** The IDE requires an improvement, so that the catches and the structure of the programs can be developed much better. It is necessary to add more functions to make it more powerful. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** With the use of this software, you save money, you do not spend much time learning how to use it, and it is easy to maintain. ### 4. PureBasic: Powerful, OOP-less, Speedy **Rating:** 4.0/5.0 stars **Reviewed by:** Rich E. | Technical Senior Program Manager, Windows Command Prompt (C:\>), Computer Software, Enterprise (> 1000 emp.) **Reviewed Date:** May 18, 2015 **What do you like best about PureBasic?** PureBasic forsakes object oriented for purely procedural programming. It has a syntax that seems familiar to C programmers, great support for Win32 API, and one source project can compile and run (assuming no use of the aforementioned Win32 API) on Mac, Linux and Windows. That's nice, productive cross-platform work! I use PureBasic when I need a Quick GUI app, very easy to built a functional (but not super pretty, in my opinion) user interface. Good for tools, line of business apps, but also has deep game and 3d programming support. Less than $100 for a lifetime license. Active community forum with many skilled experts, including PureBasic creators, to answer your questions. Built in libraries are very comprehensive and include networking, http, all kinds of graphics and on and on and on. Creates (really) small, standalone EXE's that run very fast, like close to C speed. **What do you dislike about PureBasic?** The IDE is good, but not especially great if you're used to high-end development environments. GUI creator is mired in Windows XP look and feel. You can create awesome UI, of course, it's just not a picnic to get there and will involve lots of manual programming. Community forum members are helpful but can sometimes be very rude -- search for your own answers first and do not overly disparage PureBasic whether you think it's warranted or not and you'll be fine. Might be a learning curve for someone who wants a friendly BASIC compiler. Doing more interesting things requires a good time investment and previous programming experience is very, very helpful. **Recommendations to others considering PureBasic:** Check out PowerBasic and GLBASIC as well. These are powerful as well and may be more suited to your applications and programming style. **What problems is PureBasic solving and how is that benefiting you?** Easy prototypes of logic and alogorithm, proof of concept UI's, tools of all sorts. I can spend 1 day writing a PureBasic app to ensure that what I'm thinking about doing before diving into the details and laborious coding to make it a complete project. ## PureBasic Discussions - [How fast is PureBasic's compilation speed?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/24885-how-fast-is-purebasic-s-compilation-speed) - 1 comment, 1 upvote - [View PureBasic pricing details and edition comparison](https://www.g2.com/products/purebasic/reviews?filters%5Bnps_score%5D%5B%5D=4§ion=pricing&secure%5Bexpires_at%5D=2026-08-09+02%3A22%3A58+-0500&secure%5Bsession_id%5D=272c9460-70e1-4d89-8df9-e67b58e5152a&secure%5Btoken%5D=56c854ed5cc586a2277f701bf9806ada8a867383d97b002c3955cb99e5b07914&format=llm_user) ## PureBasic Features **Coding** - Syntax highlighting - Autocompletion - Find and replace - Code folding **Editing** - Collaborative editing - Language Support - Selection Methods **Functionality** - Extensibility - Cross-platform support - Plugins and integrations - Security **Agentic AI - Landing Page Builders** - Cross-system Integration ## Top PureBasic Alternatives - [Visual Studio Code](https://www.g2.com/products/visual-studio-code/reviews) - 4.7/5.0 (2,655 reviews) - [Notepad++](https://www.g2.com/products/notepad/reviews) - 4.6/5.0 (2,412 reviews) - [Sublime Text](https://www.g2.com/products/sublime-text/reviews) - 4.5/5.0 (1,749 reviews)