It is very easy to recruit participants for studies. The participants are generally attentive and allow for interesting insights into human behavior. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform allows little flexibility. The standard study setup is good, but beyond that, little can be changed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ability to select participants as per the research requirements Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Prolific takes median time taken for the survey. In my opinion, average time spent on the survey should be used. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The large pool of subjects. You can conduct research on several topics and get large samples under many demographic characteristics.

The integration manual with different survey tools is very clear and makes the process very smooth and efficient.

The entire process of conducting incentivized research: adding money, accepting submissions, making payments, and reaching out to participants. It is a very straight-forward process from the beginning to the end. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not my case, but I've heard recently concerns about the large pool and how that could compromise data quality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy way of finding good quality sample! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is expensive for research project and many of the participants did not complete the screening questions. So, using the screeners actually drops the number of samples. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the new idea of screen out participants Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

absolutely nothing i don't have anything in mind Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For me the most appealing aspects of Prolific is its convenience and user-friendly design, which makes it incredibly straightforward to set up and launch a study.

Also, pre-screened participants is a significant advantage, which I can be confident that the data I have comes from real, verified individuals. this Prolific’s filtering options make it easy to target the individuals I want to have in my study accurately. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The major concern I have is the high fee associated with using the platform. While the quality of participants and the convenience of the platform are excellent, the cost can be prohibitive, especially for researchers with limited budgets or with a big and long term study. For instance, if a study requires a large sample size, the cumulative fees can quickly add up. I suggest, a more tiered or flexible pricing model could make Prolific more accessible, where the service fee would be lower when there are bigger samples are selected?

Another one, Prolific could enhance settings that allow for more collaborative interactions between participants. For example, a feature that enables two or more participants to join and interact with each other in real-time during a study could provide valuable insights. I think this collaborative setting could be particularly useful for more realistic researches. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ease of running studies, integrating with other software (e.g., Qualtrics) and the quick and high quality responses we usually get. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The limited options for attention checks that the platfrom allows Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Prolific is user friendly, and it is not time consuming to upload a study. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would love to have more options for cross-cultural research. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Prolific has an intuitive interface and the responses tend to be high-quality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A lot of people do surveys too fast without spending much time thinking, just trying to get through questions as fast as possible to maximize earnings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I particularly like that you get to be very specific about your sample requirements and manually approve submissions. It's not easy to do remote tests and this tool makes it easier. The participants pool is also large enough not to have repetitive testers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't have many complaints. The way the interface is organized in projects could maybe be simpler, but once you get the hang of it, it works just fine. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.