Planview AgilePlace Reviews & Product Details

Jobs can be tracked throughout the process of issuing parts and monitoring for all changes that may occur during the pulling and issuing of material. Dates are a valued asset to the process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The time span of switching between boards, sometimes it clears my entire screen and I have to go out of the program and then come back in. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the drag and drop functionality of the cards. I like how tagging users works. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I hate that you can't attach a document in the description when creating a card. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of use. Self explanatory on most actions and create or linking cards. Freedom to setup the board as best fits your use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Creating new lanes is a bit time consuming. It would be nice if you could copy over same swim lane titles from a past sprint, but not the cards, for new sprint planning. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to use, filter/highlight system, easy to customize. generally lightweight and intuitive Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Parts of the tool are too manual. Ex. A card type cannot be automatically assigned to a user so if a request or ticket is entered via card someone must manually select the person to assign to the task. It is time consuming, there should be an option to default assign based on ticket type and board.

This is just one example of where this tool falls short for ticketing processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The interface is clean and intuitive, and easy to discover and use without need for lots of documentation. It has all the features I want readily available, but isn't cluttered with stuff I don't use and/or find confusing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I've only had a couple of issues. Updates to cards require an explicit 'save' in odd places, and creating new cards with sub-tasks is kind of clunky around that. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cards can easily be moved between lanes and creating a functional board layout is easy Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Can't save or create complex filters. Needs improvement to be able to change between different views more easily for larger teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think Leankit does a good job of balancing the simplicity of a Kanban style project management board that doesn't force you to follow a complex lifecycle or require too much bootstrapping to get to work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Performance is awful on large boards. Integration with services like Github is a huge hassle. Leankit seems to be a project manager first platform. I may be biased as a software developer but I would rather use a system that puts my needs first. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Leankit helps make the process of dividing work among a team much easier. It's easy to be Lean/Agile when the repetitive parts of the process are handled so elegantly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Cards will occasionally move back to a previous lane on their own. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

... not much. It has been a functional tool for our organization to plan and track work across multiple practice areas, but it's a hot mess. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the interface relies too heavily on a visual metaphor that's not actually useful (the "card" metaphor).

I find it difficult to view a simple list of my own tasks without scrolling around a huge board. Even filtering for my cards still leaves me scrolling a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Leankit is a very flexible tool that has great reporting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's not great for small teams that need a lot of flexibility. There isn't much training support. There is no daily task view to aggregate tasks across all boards. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.