Its agility and that it is a user-friendly tool with easy comprehension. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
At the moment, I don't have any negative comments about Pirani. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Its agility and that it is a user-friendly tool with easy comprehension. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
At the moment, I don't have any negative comments about Pirani. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Pirani is an easy-to-use platform that allows you to manage risks in an organized and centralized manner. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The indicators module needs to be more user-friendly and intuitive, as the current configuration becomes confusing. In the event reports, there is a great need for an option to filter or view the reports by time scale (monthly, quarterly, etc.). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is a very user-friendly and intuitive software that has allowed me to start managing information assets and information security risks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
One of the disadvantages is that a mass update of information assets cannot be performed as it can be done in the other modules. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The system is not very complex and is intuitive, they have included a bit of AI. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Everything is separate, due to the current methodology we have at the place where I work, it is necessary to carry out a Self-assessment of the control through a monitoring test. This part is not like that in Pirani, but rather it is done by evaluating how the control is designed and if it has been effective. However, in my methodology, it is different, since the self-assessment requires executing monitoring tests and considers the design of the control, the results obtained, if there is operational loss, if there are findings and action plans related to internal audit and the regulator that are in effect. All of this gives us a score in which the control can be rated and, in turn, gives us a percentage of reduction in the inherent risk. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like its simplicity for managing risks, with clear, quick traceability and a practical focus on operational management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It may fall short in advanced customization and complex integrations with more sophisticated models. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The tool is very useful, it helps you with all kinds of reports, and furthermore, the tool is very dynamic, it helps you execute each process more easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
In the process of each module, the path must be well considered to avoid missing the required information. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Simplicity, ease of use, and parameterization Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Bulk loading of risks or action plans apparently does not support Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The graphical interface is very user-friendly and intuitive. Easy parameterization both transversally and of the management systems, mainly the risk management system. Easy linking of processes-risks-controls-action plans. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Improve in terms of managerial-type graphic reports for process owners and those responsible for managing risk maps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
that is very easy to use and quick to respond Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
it could be improved in the visualization of the tables in the sliders and allow configuring their visibility Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
How interactive the platform is, the ease of extracting reports, the level of interaction the platform has allowed us. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Among some of the gaps I have been able to identify is that, when configuring the rating magnitudes of controls, it did not allow us to adapt it to our methodology. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.