I support the investment team with due diligence package which involves large number of files and Papermark helps me manage all that in the same place. We upload videos from the founder interviews and also have the investment memo on the notion page with our firm brand. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The tool has all the much needed features and has good interface but is a little slow when loading, it is a minor issue but can be a problem when you are regularly working with large file size. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Papermark makes version control a non issue, a thing of the past. Since I handle documents with data, it is constantly changing so I end up with multiple versions of the same file from our portfolio companies. Now it is just a single link with the most recent data changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing to complain, Papermark is a great tool and I like to see better API access which slows me down when I work with multiple teams files at the same time and each requiring new updated doc version. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Papermark tracking data gives me the actual behavioural habits of how our LPs are engaging with portfolio companies and our materials. The page wise engagement data from LPs and co investors let us guide partners and help us to build reports for our IR team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has great page tracking but there is still room for better analytics, it provides a crisp summary but we need more advanced tracking information. New features can be introduced, especially for building patterns across multiple decks as comparison, like to rate all the decks based on their viewing behaviours. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Papermark is my go-to tool for staying up to date with our portfolio teams. We use it to share industry templates, company materials, and venture documents for its tracking and access control. I like how we can see who viewed what and when, which is a lifesaver when juggling updates across multiple startups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Everyone has the same viewing experience other than the brand customising nothing changes. It would be great for pitch deck, which we expect it to stay in a standard format but when using for other cases it needs more. I hope the Papermark team create the viewing more customizable in terms of interface. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Everything lives in one place as trackable links, not like scattered PDF across platforms and on firm pc. The detailed engagement analytics is my favourite feature of Papermark, it keeps the comment and tracks activities in real time. I never searched for an email thread after switching to Papermark. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish there were more filtering system for documents, once your room holds few dozen documents this becomes a must needs feature. Also, few of our recipients told us that the Papermark document link when embedded in email text, triggers spam and lands the mail to the spam folder. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Papermark has changed the way we used to share quarterly reports and portfolio company info with our limited partners. The analytics show how LPs are engaging with the deal flow and version control allows us to fix mistakes even after sharing. The branding feature is what made us keep using Papermark over dropbox. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The email notifications system primarily needs improvement, the feature is one of the most essential but it still lacks to fulfil requirement. The notification only provides that the document is just viewed but it needs to provide more detailed information about the analytics of the view. It still needs a platform login for such details. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Papermark every day to share our internal documents with our LPs and to look the incoming pitch decks from founders. We used to request founders to share links with drop box or google earlier on, but we switched to Papermark now. The version control and transparency (who viewed what and when) is very useful especially when coordinating across team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The documents search options and sorting could be made better, it is hard to locate a required doc when the document mark crosses 100+. Need more integration with existing CRM and LP management software. All in all, the tool does the job well for doc sharing, there are just improvements to be made to make it line with VC operations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In investor relations, document security and the access control are key in how we do things and Papermark does a great job here. It has an end-to-end encryption and adjustable permission control for when we share sensitive documents from our portfolio companies to the investors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would appreciate a better mobile experience than what we have right now, it is manageable for a short go on but if we were to handle document all in the mobile, especially for LPs who are often on the go, UI could use a little more work on. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What stands out is how easily I can embed charts, links, founder decks, and collaborative comments all in one place. It feels like Notion and Google Docs is together, but that’s totally built with a VC use case in mind. There is no learning curve and onboarding existing doc collections is very easy even when we are used to traditional document systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As an analyst focused on early-stage investing, Papermark has become one of the most used tools of mine. The major drawback I think is the view page loading time. Sometimes the documents take a while to load but it usually happens on document with higher file size. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Papermark for internal memos, due diligence writeups, and sharing feedback of each incoming deck with partners. The interface is minimal which is great for viewing the documents and for upload & maintenance. The access control in a single place and sorting options makes a big difference when you are writing multiple investment notes a week. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It works well but I wish there were more templates tailored for VCs like memo, landscape maps. The mobile usability is fine but not as good as web. I hope the team can make it better making reviewing pitch summaries on the go much easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.