
Paligo is cloud-based, so it works on all platforms and has regular updates. It has lots of options for reusing different kinds of content. It's a combined CCMS and help authoring platform. It has variables and conditionals. It has good features for reviewers. It has lots of options and toggles to customize your output. It has built-in translation management workflows. I chose Paligo after an extensive review of my company's needs and competitors, such as Flare and static site generators. Paligo can do everything Flare can do, works on all platforms, and is less expensive for my use cases. And it has a pretty and functional UI. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Paligo advertises an integration with Freshdesk, but the integration is so immature that it's practically unusable except for a small set of circumstances. This has been my biggest disappointment. When I have large topics with large tables, it can take longer than I like to save and generate output. But Paligo is a complex tool, and I don't find the delays to be excessive. It has a somewhat steep learning curve and can be frustrating for those who don't have prior experience with these types of tools or who don't use it on a regular basis. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.