Opentext functional Testing Reviews (46)

Reviews

Opentext functional Testing Reviews (46)

4.2
46 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Users consistently praise the product for its comprehensive testing capabilities and ease of use, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users. The integration with various tools and support for multiple technologies enhances its appeal for teams looking to streamline their testing processes. However, many reviews note that it can be resource-intensive, particularly with large test suites.
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Manibhushana Rao G.
MG
Manibhushana Rao G.
Product Manager
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"UFT"
5/5
What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?

Compatibility with ALM , Tecording feature Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?

Time of run and does not support cross browser testing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
CI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Uft user review"
1.5/5
What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?

Uft provides excellent automation support Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?

Not supports parallel execution and it's too heavy coMpared to selenium Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
GI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"UFT is a great tool to test applications for projects with short budgets. "
4.5/5
What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?

I really like the plug in features where you can install plugins to add web services and it enables you to test webservices with in qtp itself Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?

I wish the trail periods are more than 30days so that it helps in teams while in prototyping stage Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Construction
GC
Verified User in Construction
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Awesome tool 7+ years of journey with QTP/UFT"
5/5
What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?

Brought the developers and the tester to a common platform making automation testing an wholesome experience.

Compatibility with Windows, Mainframes, Mobile and web applications etc makes it even unique. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?

Licencing is very costly and consumes a lot CPU utilization which makes the performance altogether low. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nakul K.
NK
Nakul K.
Software Test Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"The best automation tool for professionals"
5/5
What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?

The way tool integrates with other platforms like .net , java,web application mobile os or mainframe is amazing. It cracks all application with its wide range of addin support makes it the best tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?

Of cource its licensing cost is very high. and some times it gets stuck due to high system utilization.

Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Suresh B.
SB
Suresh B.
Automation Architect
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Automation tool UFT excellent automation tool."
5/5
What do you like best about Opentext functional Testing?

Support So many applications, I worked with Web, Windows, mainframe (Terminal Emulator), Flex.

User VBScript as scripting language which is very easy to handel and support most of the application on windows level. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Opentext functional Testing?

Not a god support form HP for any issue. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.