It scans the code and provides a deep level of vulnerability analysis.

It helps to detect security flaws.

Though it's a static scan but does it's job well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's a static scanner which limits it from analysing dynamic scenario.

Sometime it gives false positive report as well which should be ignored by the software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

capabilities like Dynamic Application Security Testing Software along with integration with CI orchestration tools and adding its metrics as a quality gate make it a real deal-breaker Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Would like to have options to use a configurable backend and better RestAPI's for reporting and building a custom integration. Also, integration options with current CI and ALM tools should be improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fortify provides excellent drill-down capabilities for analyzing vulnerabilities and recommended steps for fixing or remediation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It would be nice to see more Dashboards and Metrics out of the box. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

How the vulnerabilities are presented. There's always detailed information to determine if the vulnerability is true false or false positive, etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

False positives and no auto report generator after a dynamic scan. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

the dashboard

simple UI

Admin panel

Integration options Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Time taking process.

No Rich colourful UI

UX is bad Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Micro Focus Application Defender is the elimination of current threats very quickly, thereby saving us lots of time and money Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about Micro Focus Application Defender is that it can be very confusing to use and some of our employees don't have the patience it requires Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For years I have been working with this company and the truth is that except for some setbacks of lost files, the overall assessment is positive. All the tools available to the company and the possible threats are controlled in real time.What I like most about this product are the neutralization of current threats and the actaulizations that occur quickly and efficiently. The speed of the resolution of them from my point of view is one of the best options available in the market today. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a negative point I would say that the documentation of the guides that are included as the notes guides are quite complex and difficult to understand. Anyway, the support team solves doubts quickly Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I liked about micro focus is that they are are extremely easy to learn and use which is great for people of all ages. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There wasn't much to dislike about this product they are constantly working to improve it. The price could be a bit lower but its still not terrible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Automation has been extremely easy to learn for our offshore vendor partners and our onsite employee leads. Script re-use has increased as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

steep learning curve but powerful set of tools.

The execution is very slow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ability to scale and growth from a on site centralized location, to a more of SaaS cloud based. The ability to have a centralize location for all security monitoring and testing within one system and application. While also having the ability to develop any new processes.

The application is very flexible in regards to setting up shop. Meaning it gives an entity the flexibility to develop according to their respective budget, company direction in regards to Portal Web Based, in house hosting, or a matrix or both. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If the application is set as a self-service tool, SaaS., it takes away some of the leverage of in-house fixes. Yes the cost is much more attractive to a smaller organization. However, for a larger entity. The upfront cost of setting the infrastructure for the application to be in house, would out weight some of the troubles of migrating later in time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.