Jan K.
JK
Jan K.
Senior Consultant
Information Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Extremely unpleasant tool to work with"
0/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

There is nothing what I really like.

It works.

Grid view of bugs is good.

Manual test plan design is quite good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Its thick client in browser. No way how to open another window. Slow, huge.

Everything is defect. Even if its a change

No easy way how to enforce workflow.

Some workflow states are default which are not possible to change from administration.

I cant do links from defect to a lot of entities, but these entities can create link to defect.

No back - forward button.

All dialogs are modal no way how to look somewhere else with opened detail of defect or anything else - impossible to used advantage of two monitors

No way how to limit some possibilities

Requirements manager is not really working as requirements manager. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nishad G.
NG
Nishad G.
Teaching Assistant
Higher Education
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"A Comprehensive Solution "
4/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

HP ALM integrates well with other HP products and has all the necessary features required to test code coverage. It also manages test data, thus making it easier to test applications. Excellent bug reporting features and analytics dashboards as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Learning curve is a bit steep and the application is not intuitive. Missing ability to edit multiple test cases together. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
II
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Invaluable for tracking requirements and defects"
4.5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

The categorization and search functions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

I don't like the ad hoc report format and often need to copy it over to a more user friendly format Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Victor C.
VC
Victor C.
BI Consultant for Workforce Insight
Sporting Goods
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Quality center for QA testing"
3.5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

> We use quality center for tracking our data requests for quality Assurance testing

> We have always applauded the ease of use of this tool while communicating with our team members and updating the changes we make to a cognos report. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

> HP Quality Center needs to make a more efficient version of the app because we have experienced lag while using this tool over the web

> Search function might get confusing at times

> The charts displaying the results of data requests or change tracking could be further improved

> I have had other teams complaining about the mobile app Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Logistics and Supply Chain
CL
Verified User in Logistics and Supply Chain
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Solid bug tracking application with bad work flows and it is not user friendly at all."
2/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

HP ALM or HP Quality Center is a solid bug tracking software which has been around for a while. There are plenty of tutorials and help resources online when you need help. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

- It doesn't have Kanban agile board. HP Quality Center works more like a water fall model.

- The user interface is not very user friendly. It requires many steps to file defect. The work flows is very bad.

- If you write test plans or create defects then it gets timeout, all of yours works will be gone. We had to re-do the works many time because HP Quality Center sometimes doesn't save our works when it gets timeout.

- HP Quality Center's performance is very bad. Sometimes it just hang and crash. QA would have to wait when loading test plans or linking test cases to test labs.

- HP Quality Center's license is very...very expensive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Kshiteesh S.
KS
Kshiteesh S.
Co-Founder
Higher Education
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Quality Center review"
3.5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Quality Center is very good ERP solution for business. I have used it for managing tickets of projects and it was very useful and helpful in tracking all my data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Its home page can be more interactive. It takes very long to load. It should be fast and easily interacting between various features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
II
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Quality center- good tool for housing requirements and test plans "
4/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Quality center- good tool for housing requirements and test plans . User friendly and better GUI Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Customization can be better , also automatic test execution Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Information Technology and Services
CI
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"ALM "
3/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

I like the ability to see a good relationship between requirements, bugs and test cases. The ability to produce reports is also helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

So far not observed any huge disadventages Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

David Y.
DY
David Y.
Senior Consultant - Strategic Technologies and Application Team
Information Technology and Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"HP QC is a great tool to manage testing process. it needs improvements"
3/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

the tool offers great organization, document sharing, test scripting features. I use it to write test cases, and it can be shared with my colleagues. they review and update it. Once we start testing, we can update the test cases with the status. It's a great tool if you are just using these features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

Though the tool offers a way to organize your test scripts and documents, the UI is very old and there are frequent freezes. This needs to be updated as there are important documents saved in this tool and it would suck to lose those from freezes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Vijay K.
VK
Vijay K.
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"HP Alm is worth a try "
3.5/5
What do you like best about OpenText Application Quality Management?

HP ALM is a good pack o services. Best feature that I liked in this was the ease with which it collaborates with Microsoft Visual Studio. This improves the productivity of the developer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about OpenText Application Quality Management?

I disliked its bug tracking feature as its not as accurate as its competitors. Rest all the feature were well and good. Developers behind this tool have put some work that is worth appreciating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.