Recommendations to others considering Newforma Konekt:
In the recent months ive compared BIMTrack, the new Autodesk BIM 360 Issue Tracker, and the Procore 3D Coordination Issue Tracker, as well. Feature wise and usability wise, i am the happiest using BIMTrack (i am having to use two of the three on different projects... The Autodesk one isnt fit for purpose, as it ONLY works with one specific file type from Navis, and only married to the BIM360 hub, both of which are not positive attributes).
While i favor BIMTrack, other considerations may be if the party considering already maintains licensing for the other applications. As we work in Bluebeam Studio for PDF's, and dont currently use/subscribe to Procore, using BIMTrack (the better issue tracking software) is a no brainer. My concern is many who already pay for enterprise subscription to Procore may default to it (even if its clunkier and lesser than) out of the convenience factor of it being inside a product they already have.
For Navis users, the integrations is great: Auto creating and grouping issues and creating them on the fly.
For Revit users, there are a lot of interesting things you can do: Including creating issues through the API and Dynamo, from your model. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What problems is Newforma Konekt solving and how is that benefiting you?
As a 3rd party project reviewer, we are often creating "issues" that are independent (or sometimes integrated) with the GC/AE's official RFI process. In the past this was done through manual PDF document creation, and coordination. Many hours per week in document tracking and conversation managing are eliminated, using an issue tracking system. The design teams we interact with are sometimes willing to engage in the web app, so we dont have to shuffle documents to them, as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.